Tools & Wizards About Us
utility.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    42% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

utility.com

Body Worn Camera & Evidence Management Tools | Utility, Inc.

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

150 ms

Resources Loaded

759 ms

Page Rendered

778 ms

utility.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to utility.com homepage info - get ready to check Utility best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about utility.com

Utility provides mobile management communications technology and services that allow utility, first responder, and transit organizations. Contact us today.

Visit utility.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Utility.com page load time and found that the first response time was 150 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

utility.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,250 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.017

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.8 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

utility.com

150 ms

styles.css

12 ms

typekit.js

5 ms

modernizr.js

6 ms

utility.com

123 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Utility.com, 16% (7 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 9% (4 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (242 ms) relates to the external source Use.typekit.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 718.4 kB (31%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Utility.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 21.0 kB

  • Original 30.0 kB
  • After minification 28.2 kB
  • After compression 9.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.0 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Utility images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 414.6 kB

  • Original 616.9 kB
  • After minification 616.6 kB
  • After compression 202.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 414.6 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 279.4 kB

  • Original 315.2 kB
  • After minification 278.7 kB
  • After compression 35.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Utility.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 279.4 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (42%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Utility. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

utility.com

utility.com

150 ms

styles.css

styles.css

12 ms

typekit.js

typekit.js

5 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

6 ms

utility.com

utility.com

123 ms

global-min.js

global-min.js

15 ms

mobile-search.png

mobile-search.png

148 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

115 ms

vimeo-thumb.php

vimeo-thumb.php

96 ms

nav-toggle.png

nav-toggle.png

68 ms

utility-logo.png

utility-logo.png

67 ms

header-search-icon.png

header-search-icon.png

67 ms

home-masthead.jpg

home-masthead.jpg

68 ms

home-hero.png

home-hero.png

74 ms

home_public_safety_area.jpg

home_public_safety_area.jpg

69 ms

play-btn.png

play-btn.png

68 ms

blank.png

blank.png

68 ms

home_transit_area.jpg

home_transit_area.jpg

71 ms

home_utility_area.jpg

home_utility_area.jpg

70 ms

bodyworn-logo.png

bodyworn-logo.png

68 ms

bg_solution_area.jpg

bg_solution_area.jpg

72 ms

bg-salesperson-btn.png

bg-salesperson-btn.png

69 ms

bg-contact-btn.png

bg-contact-btn.png

68 ms

video_bg.png

video_bg.png

70 ms

vid-close-btn.png

vid-close-btn.png

71 ms

110918254

110918254

75 ms

495342061_640.jpg

495342061_640.jpg

42 ms

UIYMwGx0LuWrDD3emvxaFPrUhyg43RStBk7HR2IeLLCffHPsgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5Mb.woff

UIYMwGx0LuWrDD3emvxaFPrUhyg43RStBk7HR2IeLLCffHPsgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5Mb.woff

147 ms

Hmr_zxzdHaIHyPxzdF1ZAPnKmKqFWnXaX8ktGiP9mwSffHHsgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5Mw.woff

Hmr_zxzdHaIHyPxzdF1ZAPnKmKqFWnXaX8ktGiP9mwSffHHsgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5Mw.woff

242 ms

9MY4rQst_yoewQrO5EaaLiOcO1gbP2x0Qd522fn64tvffH-sgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5Mj.woff

9MY4rQst_yoewQrO5EaaLiOcO1gbP2x0Qd522fn64tvffH-sgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5Mj.woff

146 ms

31aoDuHSGbSze7esswRW6eOLksFczpXmhqaR-qtQU9qffH5sgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5MX.woff

31aoDuHSGbSze7esswRW6eOLksFczpXmhqaR-qtQU9qffH5sgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5MX.woff

242 ms

xdTJgGPceUw_jFpWRob1HPV55RdyT8Hr5R78KovHzbCffHAsgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5Mt.woff

xdTJgGPceUw_jFpWRob1HPV55RdyT8Hr5R78KovHzbCffHAsgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5Mt.woff

242 ms

E0hxi_3hn3_v25wAnBK7VXzXJf3GrqgFJAqINWBglwJffHpsgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5gM.woff

E0hxi_3hn3_v25wAnBK7VXzXJf3GrqgFJAqINWBglwJffHpsgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5gM.woff

241 ms

collect

collect

19 ms

player.js

player.js

84 ms

player.css

player.css

66 ms

ga.js

ga.js

28 ms

vuid.min.js

vuid.min.js

57 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

proxy.html

proxy.html

77 ms

495342471.jpg

495342471.jpg

79 ms

8535921_60x60.jpg

8535921_60x60.jpg

48 ms

p.gif

p.gif

65 ms

Accessibility Review

utility.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

utility.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

utility.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Utility.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Utility.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

utility.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Utility. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: