1.5 sec in total
58 ms
827 ms
627 ms
Click here to check amazing VALERE content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about valere.com
Get the right role at a top company or find the best fit for your digital team.
Visit valere.comWe analyzed Valere.com page load time and found that the first response time was 58 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
valere.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value240 ms
85/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.6 s
57/100
10%
58 ms
193 ms
195 ms
90 ms
139 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Valere.com, 52% (15 requests) were made to Cdn.locomotive.works and 21% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (231 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.locomotive.works.
Page size can be reduced by 21.8 kB (1%)
1.6 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Valere.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.1 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 341 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. VALERE images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Valere.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.2 kB or 18% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (25%)
16
12
The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of VALERE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
valere.com
58 ms
www.valere.com
193 ms
www.valere.com
195 ms
gtm.js
90 ms
js
139 ms
analytics.js
77 ms
application.css
178 ms
wysihtml5_editor-fc9dd453168cc989b0d1e4df89ed54a330618916423c4a4ac4a804329cc4fb1a.css
132 ms
VALERE_Logo.png
115 ms
todays_top_jobs.png
121 ms
roles_we_fill.png
123 ms
portfolio_interview_tips.png
119 ms
jquery.min.js
231 ms
bootstrap.min.js
230 ms
application.js
182 ms
bullhorn.js
192 ms
signup_form.js
182 ms
facebook_valere.svg
189 ms
linkedin_valere.svg
226 ms
js
53 ms
css
34 ms
looking_for_work_hero.png
76 ms
about_stats_background.png
76 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDH52aE0lMZbLXGimS.woff
21 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDH52aHUlMZbLXGimSytc.woff
50 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTD-JqaE0lMZbLXGimS.woff
33 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTD-JqaHUlMZbLXGimSytc.woff
58 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDppqaE0lMZbLXGimS.woff
65 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDppqaHUlMZbLXGimSytc.woff
64 ms
valere.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
valere.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
valere.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Valere.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Valere.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
valere.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of VALERE. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: