Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

483 ms

Resources Loaded

933 ms

Page Rendered

445 ms

videomakerfxforums.com screenshot

About Website

Visit videomakerfxforums.com now to see the best up-to-date Videomakerfxforums content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about videomakerfxforums.com

See related links to what you are looking for.

Visit videomakerfxforums.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Videomakerfxforums.com page load time and found that the first response time was 483 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Videomakerfxforums.com rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

videomakerfxforums.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

videomakerfxforums.com

483 ms

index.css

110 ms

script.js

144 ms

theme.js

100 ms

portal.css

115 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Videomakerfxforums.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (483 ms) belongs to the original domain Videomakerfxforums.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 151.0 kB (45%)

Content Size

336.7 kB

After Optimization

185.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Videomakerfxforums.com main page is 336.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 155.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 45.2 kB

  • Original 53.2 kB
  • After minification 48.7 kB
  • After compression 8.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 155.7 kB
  • After minification 153.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Videomakerfxforums images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 50.4 kB

  • Original 63.5 kB
  • After minification 46.3 kB
  • After compression 13.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 50.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 53.4 kB

  • Original 64.2 kB
  • After minification 45.6 kB
  • After compression 10.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Videomakerfxforums.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 53.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (62%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

10

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Videomakerfxforums. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

videomakerfxforums.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Videomakerfxforums.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Videomakerfxforums.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Videomakerfxforums. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: