1.7 sec in total
128 ms
1.2 sec
287 ms
Visit vigilent.com now to see the best up-to-date Vigilent content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vigilent.com
Visit vigilent.comWe analyzed Vigilent.com page load time and found that the first response time was 128 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
vigilent.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.331
34/100
15%
Value4.6 s
81/100
10%
128 ms
41 ms
41 ms
43 ms
49 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Vigilent.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (660 ms) relates to the external source Ajax.googleapis.com.
Page size can be reduced by 450.5 kB (40%)
1.1 MB
676.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Vigilent.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 638.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 85.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Vigilent needs image optimization as it can save up to 85.6 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 181.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 181.0 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 135.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vigilent.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 135.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (67%)
51
17
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vigilent. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.vigilent.com
128 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
41 ms
jquery-ui.css
41 ms
cli-style.css
43 ms
intelliwidget.css
49 ms
meteor-slides.css
51 ms
style.css
43 ms
responsive.css
43 ms
style.css
47 ms
jquery-2.1.3.min.js
73 ms
core.min.js
45 ms
widget.min.js
51 ms
accordion.min.js
72 ms
accordion.js
92 ms
cookielawinfo.js
92 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
93 ms
responsive-modernizr.min.js
98 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
111 ms
jquery.metadata.v2.js
113 ms
jquery.touchwipe.1.1.1.js
105 ms
slideshow.js
105 ms
css
118 ms
css
135 ms
easy-columns.css
117 ms
responsive-scripts.min.js
130 ms
jquery.placeholder.min.js
129 ms
vigilent.js
131 ms
amjr.js
117 ms
amjr-sources.js
115 ms
wp-embed.min.js
117 ms
ga.js
94 ms
vigilent-logo.png
333 ms
b_a2-150x150.png
305 ms
VigilentIOTA.png
329 ms
Racks_R6-1200x420-1200x420.jpg
332 ms
Goldfish_R6-1200x420-1200x420.jpg
327 ms
Arrow_R51-1200x420-1200x420.jpg
335 ms
Insights-Banner_July2015.png
336 ms
VIGI_Whatwedo1024x280_RetnaDisplay-3-1.png
329 ms
hiring.png
328 ms
twitter-icon.png
331 ms
facebook-icon.png
332 ms
linkedin-icon.png
333 ms
vigilent-broadway-building-150x150.jpg
325 ms
load
660 ms
search.png
41 ms
line-gray.png
41 ms
sprite-2x-arrow.png
42 ms
cta-bg.jpg
43 ms
overlay.png
45 ms
buttons.png
42 ms
__utm.gif
87 ms
W4wDsBUluyw0tK3tykhXEfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
23 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
39 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
84 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
82 ms
vigilent.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
vigilent.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
vigilent.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vigilent.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vigilent.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vigilent.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vigilent. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: