2.1 sec in total
60 ms
1.5 sec
488 ms
Welcome to visionmedia.com homepage info - get ready to check Vision Media best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about visionmedia.com
Entertainment's trusted screening platform. Share your content with Vision Media's secure screeners, awards solutions, and publicity tools.
Visit visionmedia.comWe analyzed Visionmedia.com page load time and found that the first response time was 60 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
visionmedia.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
76/100
10%
Value6.4 s
10/100
25%
Value6.5 s
39/100
10%
Value890 ms
32/100
30%
Value0.041
99/100
15%
Value10.5 s
24/100
10%
60 ms
719 ms
100 ms
28 ms
35 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Visionmedia.com, 26% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (719 ms) belongs to the original domain Visionmedia.com.
Page size can be reduced by 244.3 kB (3%)
9.7 MB
9.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Visionmedia.com main page is 9.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 9.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 188.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 188.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vision Media images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 221 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Visionmedia.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (57%)
44
19
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vision Media. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
visionmedia.com
60 ms
www.visionmedia.com
719 ms
js
100 ms
core.min.css
28 ms
slick.min.css
35 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
40 ms
style.min.css
34 ms
default.min.css
34 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
36 ms
jquery.min.js
39 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
34 ms
et-core-unified-6294.min.css
36 ms
7707667.js
277 ms
slick.min.js
79 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
35 ms
scripts.min.js
79 ms
smoothscroll.js
33 ms
magnific-popup.js
76 ms
salvattore.js
75 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
75 ms
common.js
74 ms
movie-02.jpg
217 ms
et-divi-dynamic-tb-7754-6294-late.css
32 ms
Vision-Media_Logo_Black.svg
204 ms
AmazonStudios_266x100.png
203 ms
Netflix_266x100-1.png
204 ms
TheWaltDisneyCompany_266x100.png
203 ms
Netflix_266x100.png
205 ms
FX_266x100.png
305 ms
Paramount_266x100.png
306 ms
MGM_266x100.png
305 ms
NationalGeographic_266x100.png
304 ms
Macbook-with-Amazon-FYC-Site_2.png
588 ms
Fulfillment-899889546_1000x600.jpg
341 ms
Vision-Media-Icon.png
309 ms
White_VMX-Stream.png
304 ms
Tablet-Mockup-THR.png
305 ms
Purple_VMX-Awards.png
308 ms
movie-02.jpg
105 ms
analytics.js
141 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w9.woff
136 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf
213 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w9.woff
310 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w-.ttf
307 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w9.woff
307 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w-.ttf
313 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w9.woff
308 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-.ttf
306 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew9.woff
312 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-.ttf
313 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew9.woff
312 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf
311 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew9.woff
318 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-.ttf
316 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew9.woff
313 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew-.ttf
318 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw9.woff
314 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw-.ttf
315 ms
modules.ttf
51 ms
leadflows.js
189 ms
collectedforms.js
197 ms
7707667.js
197 ms
conversations-embed.js
195 ms
7707667.js
284 ms
White_VMX-Stream.png
55 ms
Tablet-Mockup-THR.png
172 ms
Purple_VMX-Awards.png
47 ms
linkid.js
91 ms
collect
96 ms
visionmedia.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
visionmedia.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
visionmedia.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Visionmedia.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Visionmedia.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
visionmedia.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vision Media. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: