Tools & Wizards About Us
visionsign.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 87% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

visionsign.net

Custom Signs Virginia, Washington DC, Maryland, West Virginia, VA, DC, MD, WV

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

230 ms

Resources Loaded

827 ms

Page Rendered

171 ms

visionsign.net screenshot

About Website

Visit visionsign.net now to see the best up-to-date Visionsign content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about visionsign.net

Custom signs, vehicle graphics and vehicle wraps are just a few of our specialties. With over 25 years of design experience, Vision Sign is one of the best graphics advertising, marketing and branding...

Visit visionsign.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Visionsign.net page load time and found that the first response time was 230 ms and then it took 998 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

visionsign.net performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.061

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

visionsign.net

230 ms

vision.css

136 ms

SpryCollapsiblePanel.css

170 ms

jquery.min.js

8 ms

AC_RunActiveContent.js

180 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Visionsign.net, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (346 ms) belongs to the original domain Visionsign.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 279.7 kB (60%)

Content Size

469.2 kB

After Optimization

189.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Visionsign.net main page is 469.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 272.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 28.0 kB

  • Original 35.9 kB
  • After minification 32.1 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 126.1 kB

  • Original 272.0 kB
  • After minification 145.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Visionsign needs image optimization as it can save up to 126.1 kB or 46% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 115.0 kB

  • Original 149.0 kB
  • After minification 123.8 kB
  • After compression 34.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 115.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 10.6 kB

  • Original 12.4 kB
  • After minification 6.3 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Visionsign.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (39%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Visionsign. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

visionsign.net

visionsign.net

230 ms

vision.css

vision.css

136 ms

SpryCollapsiblePanel.css

SpryCollapsiblePanel.css

170 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

8 ms

AC_RunActiveContent.js

AC_RunActiveContent.js

180 ms

SpryEffects.js

SpryEffects.js

181 ms

SpryCollapsiblePanel.js

SpryCollapsiblePanel.js

190 ms

ddsmoothmenu.js

ddsmoothmenu.js

182 ms

date.js

date.js

223 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

7 ms

lg-share-en.gif

lg-share-en.gif

27 ms

lensflare5.jpg

lensflare5.jpg

112 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

173 ms

logo_background.jpg

logo_background.jpg

141 ms

vs2.jpg

vs2.jpg

127 ms

vs3.jpg

vs3.jpg

184 ms

menu-static-image.png

menu-static-image.png

214 ms

vs10.jpg

vs10.jpg

198 ms

collect

collect

30 ms

smoothmenu.htm

smoothmenu.htm

164 ms

login-silvergold-over3.png

login-silvergold-over3.png

246 ms

login-silvergold3.png

login-silvergold3.png

283 ms

vs11.jpg

vs11.jpg

320 ms

vs12.jpg

vs12.jpg

227 ms

vs13.jpg

vs13.jpg

274 ms

dragonfire3.gif

dragonfire3.gif

346 ms

vs14.jpg

vs14.jpg

298 ms

bg_topmenu.gif

bg_topmenu.gif

154 ms

down.gif

down.gif

144 ms

Accessibility Review

visionsign.net accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

visionsign.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

visionsign.net SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Visionsign.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Visionsign.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

visionsign.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Visionsign. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: