16.4 sec in total
107 ms
7.9 sec
8.4 sec
Click here to check amazing M Weddingz content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about m.weddingz.in
Weddingz.in - mumbai's Largest Wedding Site. Find, Compare and Book from thousands of Venues and Services. Best Prices Guaranteed. Updated Contact Details, Pictures and Prices
Visit m.weddingz.inWe analyzed M.weddingz.in page load time and found that the first response time was 107 ms and then it took 16.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
m.weddingz.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
24/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value5.8 s
50/100
10%
Value1,330 ms
17/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value17.3 s
4/100
10%
107 ms
155 ms
284 ms
235 ms
279 ms
Our browser made a total of 165 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (130 requests) were addressed to the original M.weddingz.in, 8% (14 requests) were made to D3n56ro59bjwa6.cloudfront.net and 3% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) belongs to the original domain M.weddingz.in.
Page size can be reduced by 409.4 kB (15%)
2.7 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of M.weddingz.in main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 404.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 70.2 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 404.6 kB or 91% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. M Weddingz images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 381 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (11%)
151
135
The browser has sent 151 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of M Weddingz. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
m.weddingz.in
107 ms
css
155 ms
icon
284 ms
global-optimize.min.css
235 ms
home-optimize.min.css
279 ms
js
316 ms
fbconnect.js
1109 ms
new_global_plugins.min.js
235 ms
conversion.js
340 ms
new_global_custom.min.js
237 ms
india_homepage.min.js
236 ms
conversion_async.js
379 ms
analytics.js
221 ms
fbevents.js
253 ms
gtm.js
130 ms
covid-image-mobile.png
115 ms
Free-rescheduling-pop-up.png
198 ms
Token-amount-pop-up-02.png
197 ms
home_discover.png
196 ms
home_visits.png
168 ms
home_book.png
118 ms
home_vendor.png
200 ms
category_vendor.png
195 ms
navigation_icon.png
199 ms
search_icon.png
233 ms
category_venue.png
301 ms
category_real_wedding.png
229 ms
category_blog.png
231 ms
smile_1.png
228 ms
venue_not_avail_calendar.svg
228 ms
whatsapp_mobile.png
302 ms
smile_2.png
302 ms
smile_3.png
300 ms
facebook.png
306 ms
weddingz-transperent.png
1436 ms
guest-user.png
1434 ms
pricing-challenge.jpg
1438 ms
fullpixels.png
1436 ms
activityi;src=9632904;type=allsi0;cat=allsi0;ord=3953775112983;gtm=2od9s0;auiddc=1097365346.1664645346;u1=https%3A%2F%2Fm.weddingz.in%2F;~oref=https%3A%2F%2Fm.weddingz.in%2F
230 ms
js
97 ms
485062908867143
58 ms
src=9632904;type=allsi0;cat=allsi0;ord=3953775112983;gtm=2od9s0;auiddc=1097365346.1664645346;u1=https%3A%2F%2Fm.weddingz.in%2F;~oref=https%3A%2F%2Fm.weddingz.in%2F
203 ms
sdk.js
622 ms
home_cover_photo.jpg
583 ms
Destination-wedding.jpg
463 ms
Mumbai.jpg
452 ms
Delhi.jpg
451 ms
Bangalore.jpg
460 ms
Pune.jpg
463 ms
Jaipur.jpg
614 ms
Hyderabad.jpg
492 ms
Kolkata.jpg
432 ms
Ahmedabad.jpg
448 ms
Baroda.jpg
424 ms
Chandigarh.jpg
458 ms
Ludhiana.jpg
442 ms
Surat.jpg
436 ms
Udaipur.jpg
442 ms
Jodhpur.jpg
456 ms
Nagpur.jpg
454 ms
Jaisalmer.jpg
450 ms
Bikaner.jpg
441 ms
Goa.jpg
456 ms
Ranthambore.jpg
482 ms
Alleppey.jpg
483 ms
Lonavala.jpg
485 ms
Lucknow.jpg
483 ms
Khajuraho.jpg
484 ms
Ajmer.jpg
484 ms
Mandawa.jpg
523 ms
Kumbalgarh.jpg
519 ms
Chittorgarh.jpg
518 ms
Neemrana.jpg
543 ms
Karnal.jpg
520 ms
Agra.jpg
545 ms
Shimla.jpg
540 ms
Chennai.jpg
561 ms
Bhopal.jpg
562 ms
Dehradun.jpg
539 ms
ham-cover-img.jpg
1393 ms
Guwahati.jpg
266 ms
Indore.jpg
245 ms
Jhansi.jpg
324 ms
Kochi.jpg
237 ms
Lavasa.jpg
236 ms
Mahabaleshwar.jpg
280 ms
Mussoorie.jpg
310 ms
Nainital.jpg
257 ms
Patna.jpg
257 ms
Ranakpur.jpg
254 ms
Alibag.jpg
254 ms
Amritsar.jpg
270 ms
Igatpuri.jpg
282 ms
Pushkar.jpg
279 ms
Mysore.jpg
273 ms
Bareilly.jpg
3645 ms
Srinagar.jpg
2572 ms
Dhanbad.jpg
2945 ms
Aligarh.jpg
294 ms
Alwar.jpg
255 ms
Asansol.jpg
256 ms
Aurangabad.jpg
253 ms
Bharatpur.jpg
288 ms
Bhubaneswar.jpg
286 ms
Coimbatore.jpg
873 ms
Cuttack.jpg
874 ms
Daman-And-Diu.jpg
871 ms
Dharamshala.jpg
1176 ms
Digha.jpg
911 ms
Durgapur.jpg
3246 ms
Faridabad.jpg
1131 ms
Gandhinagar.jpg
1144 ms
Gangtok.jpg
1149 ms
Ghaziabad.jpg
1135 ms
Gurugram.jpg
1133 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
572 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
840 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
825 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
829 ms
flUhRq6tzZclQEJ-Vdg-IuiaDsNZ.ttf
840 ms
Gwalior.jpg
1117 ms
sdk.js
798 ms
Haridwar.jpg
1109 ms
Howrah.jpg
1117 ms
Jabalpur.jpg
1109 ms
Jalandhar.jpg
1067 ms
Jammu.jpg
3794 ms
Jamshedpur.jpg
1091 ms
Jim-Corbett.jpg
1554 ms
Kanpur.jpg
1554 ms
Karjat.jpg
1537 ms
Kota.jpg
1527 ms
Kumbhalgarh.jpg
1527 ms
Matheran.jpg
1663 ms
Mathura.jpg
1687 ms
Meerut.jpg
1824 ms
Moradabad.jpg
1795 ms
Nashik.jpg
1821 ms
Noida.jpg
1850 ms
Panipat.jpg
1844 ms
Patiala.jpg
1848 ms
Prayagraj.jpg
1920 ms
Puri.jpg
1825 ms
social_sprite.png
535 ms
zopim-mobile.png
1026 ms
Raipur.jpg
1357 ms
Rajkot.jpg
1374 ms
Ranchi.jpg
1393 ms
Ratnagiri.jpg
2381 ms
Rishikesh.jpg
1327 ms
Rohtak.jpg
3424 ms
Shirdi.jpg
1692 ms
Siliguri.jpg
1708 ms
Silvassa.jpg
1728 ms
Sonipat.jpg
1763 ms
Tirupati.jpg
1787 ms
Trivandrum.jpg
1806 ms
Ujjain.jpg
1821 ms
Varanasi.jpg
1840 ms
Visakhapatnam.jpg
1837 ms
396 ms
2273 ms
2565 ms
84 ms
tick-mask.svg
887 ms
m.weddingz.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
No form fields have multiple labels
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
m.weddingz.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
m.weddingz.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise M.weddingz.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that M.weddingz.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
m.weddingz.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of M Weddingz. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: