11.5 sec in total
2.7 sec
8.5 sec
264 ms
Visit web-sites-builder.com now to see the best up-to-date Websites Builder content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about web-sites-builder.com
websites builder
Visit web-sites-builder.comWe analyzed Web-sites-builder.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 8.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
web-sites-builder.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.0 s
0/100
10%
Value15.9 s
0/100
25%
Value12.2 s
3/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.256
48/100
15%
Value14.5 s
9/100
10%
2738 ms
128 ms
121 ms
172 ms
200 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Web-sites-builder.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Web-sites-builder.com.
Page size can be reduced by 946.7 kB (47%)
2.0 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Web-sites-builder.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 898.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.4 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Websites Builder images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 612.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 612.4 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 248.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Web-sites-builder.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 248.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (71%)
69
20
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Websites Builder. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.web-sites-builder.com
2738 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
128 ms
jellyfish-counter.css
121 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.css
172 ms
jquery-ui-spinner.css
200 ms
calendar-jos.css
135 ms
form_maker_frontend.css
147 ms
wpresmenu.css
222 ms
css
44 ms
subscribe.css
239 ms
main.min.css
213 ms
slider.css
223 ms
responsive.css
390 ms
font-awesome.min.css
270 ms
css
57 ms
style.css
283 ms
styles.css
279 ms
jquery.js
454 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
304 ms
js
57 ms
if_gmap_front_end.js
338 ms
jelly.min.js
403 ms
file-upload.js
347 ms
calendar.js
434 ms
calendar_function.js
403 ms
main_div_front_end.js
490 ms
scripts.js
452 ms
jquery.transit.min.js
489 ms
jquery.sidr.js
489 ms
wpresmenu.js
500 ms
responsive.js
621 ms
slider.js
522 ms
jquery.imagesloaded.min.js
517 ms
masonry.min.js
640 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
546 ms
custom.js
562 ms
BanrExL.php
117 ms
addthis_widget.js
15 ms
output.css
543 ms
widget.min.js
562 ms
core.min.js
581 ms
mouse.min.js
597 ms
slider.min.js
525 ms
button.min.js
559 ms
spinner.min.js
557 ms
effect.min.js
544 ms
effect-shake.min.js
587 ms
navigation.js
558 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
546 ms
wp-gallery-custom-links.js
772 ms
big_square_banner_2.gif
35 ms
banner-9cb052e04709102c1de3160a52a1dfb4.png
34 ms
otohits_en.gif
548 ms
getimg.php
461 ms
Websitesbuilder.gif
250 ms
hacker-265x135.jpg
399 ms
3d9e7f50da6f7af2abe968de687b55d0-130x135.jpg
270 ms
band-website-builder-130x135.jpg
399 ms
social-Media5.jpg
647 ms
webtraffic-1-130x135.jpg
330 ms
hacker.jpg
332 ms
3d9e7f50da6f7af2abe968de687b55d0.jpg
399 ms
band-website-builder.jpg
398 ms
webtraffic-1.jpg
776 ms
getimg.php
450 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
516 ms
analytics.js
10 ms
collect
16 ms
300lo.json
45 ms
ie67-css.d5089428ac7f05efd372.js
15 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
20 ms
web-sites-builder.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
web-sites-builder.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
web-sites-builder.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Web-sites-builder.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Web-sites-builder.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
web-sites-builder.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Websites Builder. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: