14.1 sec in total
1.9 sec
11.8 sec
412 ms
Welcome to webbeez.com homepage info - get ready to check Webbeez best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about webbeez.com
Submit your website into our premium listing
Visit webbeez.comWe analyzed Webbeez.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 12.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
webbeez.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.0 s
1/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value15.0 s
1/100
10%
Value12,780 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.269
45/100
15%
Value25.7 s
0/100
10%
1863 ms
23 ms
167 ms
127 ms
192 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Webbeez.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Maps.google.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9 sec) belongs to the original domain Webbeez.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (80%)
2.4 MB
472.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Webbeez.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 90.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Webbeez needs image optimization as it can save up to 43.5 kB or 74% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 803.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 803.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 963.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webbeez.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 963.1 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (85%)
61
9
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webbeez. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webbeez.com
1863 ms
analytics.js
23 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
167 ms
styles.css
127 ms
settings.css
192 ms
colorbox.min.css
131 ms
jquery.selectbox.css
130 ms
jquery.select2-3.5.1.css
252 ms
font-awesome.css
266 ms
jquery-ui.css
257 ms
base-style.css
221 ms
base-style.css
254 ms
base-style.css
281 ms
style-1.34.css
711 ms
preloading-1.34.css
509 ms
typography-1.34-en_US.css
380 ms
jquery.js
453 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
328 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
504 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
455 ms
collect
14 ms
jquery.form.min.js
240 ms
scripts.js
313 ms
underscore.min.js
314 ms
ait.js
314 ms
jquery.colorbox.min.js
371 ms
jquery.selectbox-0.2.js
364 ms
jquery.select2-3.5.1.js
558 ms
jquery.raty-2.5.2.js
374 ms
jquery-waypoints-2.0.3.js
377 ms
jquery.infieldlabel-0.1.4.js
428 ms
js
48 ms
gmap3.min.js
664 ms
gmap3.infobox.js
436 ms
mobile.js
438 ms
menu.js
490 ms
core.min.js
551 ms
widget.min.js
551 ms
accordion.min.js
553 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
552 ms
portfolio-item.js
577 ms
custom.js
576 ms
script.js
616 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
611 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
615 ms
jquery.carousel.js
699 ms
tabs.min.js
669 ms
tabs.js
630 ms
rule-btn.js
640 ms
wp-embed.min.js
631 ms
reset.css
243 ms
alert.css
276 ms
ait-login-logo.png
743 ms
video-alternative.jpg
1615 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
712 ms
opensans-condbold.woff
713 ms
category_default-555627530.png
73 ms
admin-elements-setup.png
3639 ms
admin-elements-page-builer.png
2652 ms
admin-elements-columns.png
5816 ms
admin-elements-support.png
4811 ms
admin-elements-seo.png
6933 ms
admin-elements-sidebarmanager.png
7950 ms
admin-elements-appearance.png
8991 ms
preloader_default.gif
70 ms
select2.png
2995 ms
ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png
3058 ms
ui-bg_highlight-soft_75_cccccc_1x100.png
3122 ms
common.js
19 ms
util.js
39 ms
stats.js
38 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
60 ms
webbeez.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
webbeez.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
webbeez.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webbeez.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Webbeez.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webbeez.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webbeez. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: