2.9 sec in total
236 ms
2.2 sec
414 ms
Welcome to webdesignchoice.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Web Design Choice best content for Pakistan right away, or after learning these important things about webdesignchoice.co.uk
Web Choice UK is an award-winning web development and digital marketing company - Giving outstanding results through branding, web design, web development and result oriented SEO and online marketing.
Visit webdesignchoice.co.ukWe analyzed Webdesignchoice.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 236 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
webdesignchoice.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value4.4 s
40/100
25%
Value4.8 s
67/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value6.6 s
57/100
10%
236 ms
393 ms
118 ms
312 ms
1599 ms
Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Webdesignchoice.co.uk, 17% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Secure.leadforensics.com.
Page size can be reduced by 390.8 kB (29%)
1.4 MB
961.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Webdesignchoice.co.uk main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 840.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.1 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Design Choice images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 160.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 160.3 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 177.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webdesignchoice.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 177.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (45%)
38
21
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Design Choice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webdesignchoice.co.uk
236 ms
www.webdesignchoice.co.uk
393 ms
style.css
118 ms
bootstrap.min.css
312 ms
56914.js
1599 ms
jquery-1.11.2.min.js
388 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
286 ms
jquery.mmenu.min.all.js
287 ms
scrollReveal.js
296 ms
indexjs.js
475 ms
analytics.js
118 ms
all.js
116 ms
banner-bg.jpg
211 ms
bnr-animte-image.png
295 ms
test-3.png
288 ms
rb-testi.png
198 ms
test-1.png
215 ms
arrow-testi.png
205 ms
blue-line.png
294 ms
web-desing.png
487 ms
cms.png
309 ms
e-commerce.png
402 ms
online-market.png
464 ms
adv-bg.jpg
1094 ms
NEXA%20BOLD.OTF
457 ms
font-awesome.min.css
357 ms
demo.css
447 ms
jquery.mmenu.all.css
457 ms
owl.carousel.css
505 ms
raleway.css
532 ms
style.css
533 ms
preloader.css
537 ms
header.html
546 ms
footer.html
580 ms
collect
12 ms
45 ms
xd_arbiter.php
29 ms
collect
56 ms
logo.png
449 ms
IczWvq5y_Cwwv_rBjOtT0w.woff
464 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8xsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
491 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
496 ms
8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-kxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
511 ms
RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
510 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12bxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
510 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
510 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
509 ms
PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
510 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
448 ms
sgtracker.js
525 ms
logo-white.png
128 ms
phgiottr.js
34 ms
webdesignchoice.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
webdesignchoice.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
webdesignchoice.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webdesignchoice.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webdesignchoice.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webdesignchoice.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Design Choice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: