6.8 sec in total
122 ms
5.9 sec
756 ms
Visit webdesignteam.com now to see the best up-to-date Web Design Team content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webdesignteam.com
We are a team of professionally managed 200+ highly talented creative designers and web developers. We work on static as well as dynamic (Content Management System, Shopping Cart etc.) websites.
Visit webdesignteam.comWe analyzed Webdesignteam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 122 ms and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
webdesignteam.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
68/100
10%
Value6.9 s
7/100
25%
Value4.4 s
74/100
10%
Value270 ms
82/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value7.4 s
49/100
10%
122 ms
133 ms
365 ms
41 ms
75 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Webdesignteam.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Consent.cookiebot.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Cdn.onesignal.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5 sec) relates to the external source Code.jquery.com.
Page size can be reduced by 207.5 kB (9%)
2.4 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Webdesignteam.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.2 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Design Team images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 150.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 150.4 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webdesignteam.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (30%)
73
51
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Design Team. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webdesignteam.com
122 ms
webdesignteam.com
133 ms
www.webdesignteam.com
365 ms
font-awesome.min.css
41 ms
bootstrap.min.css
75 ms
index.css
97 ms
style.css
98 ms
responsive.css
114 ms
lightslider.css
110 ms
animate.min.css
110 ms
picbox.css
119 ms
uc.js
5031 ms
OneSignalSDK.js
84 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
5039 ms
bootstrap.min.js
215 ms
jquery.min.js
5039 ms
picbox.js
215 ms
wow.min.js
220 ms
jquery.filterizr.js
217 ms
controls.js
218 ms
lightslider.js
219 ms
portfolio1.jpg
192 ms
home-banner.png
194 ms
yellow-glow-bkg.png
196 ms
srvs-pic-lrg.png
217 ms
yellow-bkg.png
191 ms
testimonial-bkg.png
193 ms
footer-str-img1.png
192 ms
portfolio2.jpg
196 ms
portfolio3.jpg
195 ms
portfolio4.jpg
197 ms
portfolio5.jpg
201 ms
portfolio6.jpg
197 ms
portfolio7.jpg
199 ms
portfolio8.jpg
199 ms
portfolio9.jpg
201 ms
portfolio10.jpg
202 ms
portfolio11.jpg
203 ms
portfolio12.jpg
207 ms
portfolio13.jpg
207 ms
portfolio14.jpg
209 ms
portfolio15.jpg
214 ms
portfolio16.jpg
211 ms
portfolio17.jpg
223 ms
portfolio18.jpg
227 ms
portfolio19.jpg
226 ms
portfolio20.jpg
240 ms
web-logo.png
241 ms
team-mmbrs-icon.png
240 ms
satisfied-client-icon.png
246 ms
years-business-icon.png
225 ms
design-created-icon.png
221 ms
hdng-crve-img.png
229 ms
benifits-icon1.png
233 ms
benifits-icon2.png
229 ms
benifits-icon3.png
241 ms
tv.png
262 ms
why-us-icon-01.png
98 ms
why-us-icon-02.png
103 ms
why-us-icon-03.png
102 ms
why-us-icon-04.png
108 ms
why-us-icon-05.png
111 ms
srvs-icon-01.png
123 ms
srvs-icon-02.png
126 ms
srvs-icon-03.png
123 ms
srvs-icon-04.png
130 ms
zoom.png
132 ms
appo1.png
131 ms
appo2.png
142 ms
client.png
144 ms
footer-str-img2.png
142 ms
contact-img.png
150 ms
sourcesanspro-regular-webfont.woff
153 ms
Raleway_gdi.woff
164 ms
lato-heavy-webfont.woff
163 ms
sourcesanspro-bold-webfont.woff
162 ms
sourcesanspro-light-webfont.woff
161 ms
Raleway-Bold_gdi.woff
195 ms
Raleway-Light_gdi.woff
193 ms
droidserif-italic-webfont.woff
181 ms
jennasue-webfont.woff
180 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
180 ms
top.png
167 ms
cc.js
260 ms
controls.png
27 ms
bc-v4.min.html
53 ms
webdesignteam.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
webdesignteam.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
webdesignteam.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webdesignteam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Webdesignteam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webdesignteam.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Design Team. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: