3.9 sec in total
965 ms
2.1 sec
864 ms
Welcome to webdevelopmentrfp.com homepage info - get ready to check Web Development RFP best content for Canada right away, or after learning these important things about webdevelopmentrfp.com
Web Development RFP, Web Design RFP, Website Design Bids, Content Management System Contracts, Tenders, Projects - WebDevelopmentRFP.com
Visit webdevelopmentrfp.comWe analyzed Webdevelopmentrfp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 965 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
webdevelopmentrfp.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value9.6 s
0/100
25%
Value9.5 s
12/100
10%
Value2,250 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.018
100/100
15%
Value10.9 s
21/100
10%
965 ms
53 ms
37 ms
44 ms
62 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Webdevelopmentrfp.com, 24% (10 requests) were made to Files.rfpmart.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (965 ms) belongs to the original domain Webdevelopmentrfp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 394.2 kB (44%)
899.2 kB
504.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Webdevelopmentrfp.com main page is 899.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 530.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 206.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 76.7 kB, which is 33% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 206.8 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Web Development RFP needs image optimization as it can save up to 34.8 kB or 38% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 148.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 148.2 kB or 28% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webdevelopmentrfp.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (53%)
34
16
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Development RFP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webdevelopmentrfp.com
965 ms
css
53 ms
bootstrap.css
37 ms
font-awesome.min.css
44 ms
custom-style.css
62 ms
style-guest.css
47 ms
style.css
55 ms
adsbygoogle.js
130 ms
js
188 ms
api.js
69 ms
api.js
178 ms
jquery-1.11.3.min.js
100 ms
bootstrap.js
176 ms
script.js
184 ms
location_search.js
326 ms
moment-with-locales.js
219 ms
bootstrap-datetimepicker.js
216 ms
bootstrap-datetimepicker.css
221 ms
select2.min.css
216 ms
select2.min.js
218 ms
query.png
119 ms
alert.png
119 ms
paypal.png
111 ms
feedback.png
112 ms
logo.svg
116 ms
register-as-buyer.svg
160 ms
query.svg
156 ms
alert.svg
161 ms
feedback.svg
563 ms
logo.png
205 ms
banner.jpg
125 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
216 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
303 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
435 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
435 ms
show_ads_impl.js
250 ms
zrt_lookup.html
209 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
167 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
652 ms
ads
165 ms
sodar
47 ms
webdevelopmentrfp.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
webdevelopmentrfp.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
webdevelopmentrfp.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webdevelopmentrfp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webdevelopmentrfp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webdevelopmentrfp.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Development RFP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: