2.4 sec in total
324 ms
1.8 sec
232 ms
Visit websecuritywatch.com now to see the best up-to-date Web Securitywatch content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about websecuritywatch.com
Web Security Watch is an aggregator of security reports coming from various sources. It aims to provide a single point of tracking for all publicly disclosed security issues that matter.
Visit websecuritywatch.comWe analyzed Websecuritywatch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 324 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
websecuritywatch.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value9.7 s
0/100
25%
Value4.9 s
65/100
10%
Value930 ms
30/100
30%
Value0.149
76/100
15%
Value9.0 s
33/100
10%
324 ms
168 ms
266 ms
440 ms
375 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Websecuritywatch.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (523 ms) belongs to the original domain Websecuritywatch.com.
Page size can be reduced by 300.5 kB (58%)
515.9 kB
215.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Websecuritywatch.com main page is 515.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 407.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.2 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 74 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Securitywatch images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 223.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 223.1 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Websecuritywatch.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 33.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (81%)
32
6
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Securitywatch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.websecuritywatch.com
324 ms
ddBLCsMwDATQC9W4WfU4QZUnjiH-YCkNvX0d2kUW6lZPDMNM_pBj5l205nnZC2uqRTyLeNH3BrlNXrCBFcEpRXH9pJU6rk_3M-Z3_p58REFPbNEKCuiWLLWqLUen1mySFPCkP3k9m-0axVSiJVxzRlGxregwi8YsTkCdV1MhbeyaXhh7ninE6s5y7uFT4W0PuI7-AQ.css
168 ms
M9QvL9AtydctKc8sKUkt0k8uLtaHsnXTUlNTAA.css
266 ms
jcrBDYAgDADAhdDGMJDBBk0JbZGWELf34wD-7nERyj1yf0L8sDBdPXlemSRsMG3uOMyV93MIOqkYFMNOzQ1Qa03N6Kj5x2VWeQE.js
440 ms
recmnd.js
375 ms
M9QvTs1JTS5JTdEtSUwv1i0qLtYvzkgsStXPKk4uyiwoKdZPzs_Nzc_TMdAvLy6HySWWJRIpnVGSm2MKAA.js
216 ms
adsbygoogle.js
7 ms
M9RPzs8rSUwu0U3LL8rVNdfPzEvOKU1JLdbPAqLC0tSiSj2QjF5uZh4A.js
285 ms
M9RPzs8rSUwu0U3LL8rVNdfPzEvOKU1JLdbPKtYvTi7KLCgpBgA.js
337 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
4 ms
gprofiles.js
56 ms
M9TPSi0pSEzO1s_NTynNSS3WLy9IL8rPyAcA.js
440 ms
wp-embed.min.js
441 ms
e-201611.js
3 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
286 ms
analytics.min.js
251 ms
ga.js
54 ms
logo.png
297 ms
searchform-submit.png
298 ms
subscribe-icon.png
234 ms
category-articles.png
235 ms
feed-icon.png
339 ms
category-alerts.png
384 ms
leaguegothic-regular-webfont.woff
479 ms
dekar-webfont.woff
523 ms
js
11 ms
hovercard.css
29 ms
services.css
182 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
g.gif
4 ms
in.php
143 ms
p
241 ms
t
257 ms
d1df5bz
70 ms
intercom.21a35ffd.js
63 ms
echo.515e8809.js
19 ms
websecuritywatch.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
websecuritywatch.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
websecuritywatch.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Websecuritywatch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Websecuritywatch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
websecuritywatch.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: