8.4 sec in total
875 ms
5.6 sec
1.9 sec
Click here to check amazing WebURL content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about weburl.in
Searching for SEO submission resource free? Check high DA Backlinks of directory submission, classified submission sites list, social bookmarking etc.
Visit weburl.inWe analyzed Weburl.in page load time and found that the first response time was 875 ms and then it took 7.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
weburl.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value3.4 s
66/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value3,370 ms
2/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.1 s
52/100
10%
875 ms
797 ms
339 ms
794 ms
1172 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Weburl.in, 6% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Weburl.in.
Page size can be reduced by 47.3 kB (39%)
120.3 kB
72.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Weburl.in main page is 120.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 57.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. WebURL images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 63 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 404 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Weburl.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (44%)
34
19
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of WebURL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
weburl.in
875 ms
global.css
797 ms
style.min.css
339 ms
style.css
794 ms
main.min.css
1172 ms
main.min.css
951 ms
main.min.css
953 ms
page-title.min.css
1230 ms
back-to-top.min.css
1564 ms
sidebar.min.css
1563 ms
stackable.min.css
1711 ms
wpforms.min.css
1748 ms
js
107 ms
main.js
1976 ms
main.js
2095 ms
wp-embed.min.js
2353 ms
analytics.js
189 ms
js
185 ms
25035344_WebURL-Logo.png
895 ms
How-To-Fix-Low-Text-To-HTML-Ratio-SEMrush-768x403.webp
897 ms
Questions-Answers-768x403.webp
870 ms
Business-Listing-Sites-1-768x403.webp
883 ms
SocialBookmarking-Sites-768x403.webp
1144 ms
Pinterest-Board-Name-768x403.webp
1468 ms
Optimize-Wordpress-768x403.webp
1902 ms
Install-Wordpress-768x403.webp
1688 ms
Wordpress-Plugins-768x403.webp
1909 ms
Secure-Wordpress-768x403.webp
1939 ms
Website-Traffic-768x403.webp
1661 ms
How-To-Fix-Low-Text-To-HTML-Ratio-SEMrush-150x150.webp
2288 ms
Website-Traffic-150x150.webp
2475 ms
Secure-Wordpress-150x150.webp
2461 ms
Wordpress-Plugins-150x150.webp
2687 ms
Install-Wordpress-150x150.webp
2649 ms
collect
21 ms
weburl.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
weburl.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
weburl.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Weburl.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Weburl.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
weburl.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of WebURL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: