3.4 sec in total
197 ms
2.9 sec
257 ms
Click here to check amazing Wire Decking content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wiredecking.com
Choosing wire decking is critical component of smart storage. We offer a variety of top of the line wire decking designed for the toughest storage situations. Buy Now!
Visit wiredecking.comWe analyzed Wiredecking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 197 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
wiredecking.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value23.5 s
0/100
25%
Value26.2 s
0/100
10%
Value21,840 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.103
89/100
15%
Value40.9 s
0/100
10%
197 ms
678 ms
150 ms
148 ms
138 ms
Our browser made a total of 116 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Wiredecking.com, 3% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (4 requests) were made to Secure.livechatinc.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (678 ms) relates to the external source Material-handling.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (56%)
2.8 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Wiredecking.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wire Decking images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 330.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wiredecking.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 330.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (68%)
106
34
The browser has sent 106 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wire Decking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 61 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wire-decking.html
197 ms
wire-decking.html
678 ms
style.css
150 ms
style.css
148 ms
testimonial.css
138 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
137 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.css
140 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css
188 ms
chosen.css
200 ms
prototype.js
241 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
227 ms
noconflict.js
194 ms
ccard.js
192 ms
validation.js
234 ms
builder.js
236 ms
effects.js
271 ms
dragdrop.js
273 ms
controls.js
281 ms
slider.js
285 ms
js.js
282 ms
form.js
288 ms
translate.js
283 ms
cookies.js
286 ms
autocomplete.js
328 ms
analytics.js
331 ms
campaignCatcher.js
325 ms
tinybox.js
334 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
329 ms
selectivizr.js
332 ms
matchMedia.js
372 ms
matchMedia.addListener.js
372 ms
enquire.js
373 ms
app.js
377 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
379 ms
jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js
384 ms
slideshow.js
418 ms
font-awesome.min.css
27 ms
seal.js
78 ms
json2.min.js
49 ms
mongoose.fp.js
176 ms
loader.js
220 ms
conversion.js
58 ms
styles.css
427 ms
madisonisland.css
291 ms
masonrymenu.css
299 ms
faqlibrary.css
300 ms
faq.css
302 ms
imagesloaded.js
336 ms
minicart.js
343 ms
masonrymenu.js
296 ms
custom.js
291 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
304 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.js
333 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
299 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
291 ms
chosen.proto.js
293 ms
event.simulate.js
266 ms
product-media.js
266 ms
swatches-list.js
294 ms
material-handling-tracking-footer.js
371 ms
analytics.js
75 ms
12691-r.gif
258 ms
logo.png
66 ms
icon_call.png
67 ms
icon_envelop.png
64 ms
icon_sprite.png
65 ms
icon_sprite_new.png
67 ms
Inverted-Step-Primary_1.png
158 ms
Step-Primary.png
253 ms
Flared-Primary.png
124 ms
Inverted-Step-Primary.png
215 ms
Inside-Waterfall-Primary.png
195 ms
linkedin.png
108 ms
twitter.png
157 ms
facebook.png
170 ms
google.png
219 ms
youtube.png
215 ms
mhi.png
219 ms
IARW.png
239 ms
ease.png
285 ms
montserrat-regular.svg
288 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
21 ms
bkg_footer.jpg
312 ms
linkid.js
10 ms
secure90x72.gif
16 ms
f5cba909-4f0b-4c95-b27d-3abeec066f0f.js
134 ms
collect
8 ms
collect
78 ms
collect
35 ms
ga-audiences
35 ms
tracking.js
187 ms
mm-getvar.js
67 ms
mm-control.php
54 ms
sn-id
55 ms
token
103 ms
ujutilv2sll.js
320 ms
number-changer.js
68 ms
script_data.js
171 ms
auth
81 ms
localization.en.0.3632191afe35222a6b78c04d457adc0d_2f076a1b427b30a9f816f1afd1ea68d4.js
47 ms
ping
89 ms
button_offline015.png
31 ms
open_chat.cgi
100 ms
create.json
61 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
25 ms
livechat-modern_7cf45543dc.ttf
33 ms
getnumdata.js
168 ms
sdk.js
540 ms
embedded.20160318100705.js
223 ms
js
192 ms
pixel.gif
86 ms
pixel.gif
82 ms
gtmp_compiled_9-hatpZX8VY.js
78 ms
56 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
27 ms
KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff
28 ms
wiredecking.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
No form fields have multiple labels
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
wiredecking.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
wiredecking.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wiredecking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wiredecking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wiredecking.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wire Decking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: