7.3 sec in total
1.8 sec
5.1 sec
435 ms
Click here to check amazing Women Fitness Reviews content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about womenfitnessreviews.com
All the fitness advice for women in one place! Detailed reviews, useful tips and great advice for a healthy, fit and beautiful feminine body!
Visit womenfitnessreviews.comWe analyzed Womenfitnessreviews.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
womenfitnessreviews.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value4.6 s
35/100
25%
Value6.6 s
37/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.099
90/100
15%
Value5.9 s
65/100
10%
1813 ms
232 ms
172 ms
390 ms
26 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Womenfitnessreviews.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Womenfitnessreviews.com.
Page size can be reduced by 256.8 kB (42%)
609.2 kB
352.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Womenfitnessreviews.com main page is 609.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 288.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Women Fitness Reviews needs image optimization as it can save up to 34.1 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 139.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 139.3 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 59.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Womenfitnessreviews.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 59.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (52%)
42
20
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Women Fitness Reviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.womenfitnessreviews.com
1813 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
232 ms
wp-pa_plagiarismavenger-style.css
172 ms
styles.css
390 ms
css
26 ms
core.css
442 ms
style-blue.css
373 ms
jquery.js
381 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
410 ms
jquery.form.min.js
505 ms
scripts.js
503 ms
ssba.min.js
503 ms
jquery.atom.min.js
598 ms
wp-embed.min.js
607 ms
logoready.png
405 ms
womenfitnessline.jpg
405 ms
the-venus-factor.png
406 ms
curvalicious.jpg
406 ms
visual-impact-for-women.jpg
548 ms
fit-yummy-mummy.jpg
408 ms
google.png
402 ms
pinterest.png
424 ms
stumbleupon.png
616 ms
facebook.png
617 ms
twitter.png
631 ms
linkedin.png
628 ms
womenfitnessblog.jpg
705 ms
copy3.png
682 ms
header.jpg
786 ms
bg.png
799 ms
shadow.png
842 ms
bg-nav.png
788 ms
nav-a.png
843 ms
icons.png
835 ms
nav-div.png
935 ms
bg-main-r.jpg
930 ms
bg-main-l.jpg
958 ms
tabs.png
931 ms
search.png
1001 ms
block-t.png
931 ms
10JVD_humAd5zP2yrFqw6onF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
10 ms
counter.js
9 ms
t.php
262 ms
tp-sc.png
638 ms
womenfitnessreviews.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
womenfitnessreviews.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
womenfitnessreviews.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Womenfitnessreviews.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Womenfitnessreviews.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
womenfitnessreviews.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Women Fitness Reviews. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: