Report Summary

  • 90

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 58

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 25% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    22% of websites

womenforsafety.org

«Женщины за Безопасность» — Автономная Некоммерческая Организация Женщины за безопасность

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

810 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

184 ms

womenforsafety.org screenshot

About Website

Visit womenforsafety.org now to see the best up-to-date Womenforsafety content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about womenforsafety.org

Женщины за безопасность, Пожарная безопасность, Пропаганда пожарной безопасности, Обучение правилам пожарной безопасности, Пожары

Visit womenforsafety.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Womenforsafety.org page load time and found that the first response time was 810 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

womenforsafety.org performance score

90

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

95/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

89/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.4 s

48/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

womenforsafety.org

810 ms

style.css

247 ms

logo.jpg

375 ms

listovka.jpg

375 ms

suveniry.jpg

373 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Womenforsafety.org, 15% (2 requests) were made to W.uptolike.com and 15% (2 requests) were made to Counter.yadro.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (810 ms) belongs to the original domain Womenforsafety.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 23.6 kB (33%)

Content Size

70.9 kB

After Optimization

47.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Womenforsafety.org main page is 70.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 43.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 20.1 kB

  • Original 25.7 kB
  • After minification 25.0 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 43.6 kB
  • After minification 41.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Womenforsafety images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 1.6 kB
  • After minification 1.3 kB
  • After compression 501 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Womenforsafety.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 69% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

10

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Womenforsafety. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

womenforsafety.org accessibility score

58

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

womenforsafety.org best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

womenforsafety.org SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Womenforsafety.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Womenforsafety.org main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Womenforsafety. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: