4 sec in total
978 ms
2.8 sec
239 ms
Click here to check amazing Wplifeguard content for Pakistan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wplifeguard.com
IsItWP is a free tool that allows you easily detect if a website is using WordPress and what WordPress themes and WordPress plugins they are using.
Visit wplifeguard.comWe analyzed Wplifeguard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 978 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
wplifeguard.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
78/100
10%
Value4.9 s
29/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value490 ms
59/100
30%
Value0.056
98/100
15%
Value8.6 s
37/100
10%
978 ms
32 ms
132 ms
131 ms
132 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Wplifeguard.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Facebook.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (978 ms) belongs to the original domain Wplifeguard.com.
Page size can be reduced by 58.9 kB (9%)
632.9 kB
574.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Wplifeguard.com main page is 632.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 509.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.3 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wplifeguard images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 392 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 45.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wplifeguard.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 45.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (31%)
35
24
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wplifeguard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wplifeguard.com
978 ms
ga.js
32 ms
wpp.css
132 ms
wp-syntax.css
131 ms
styles.css
132 ms
jquery.min.js
61 ms
style.uncompressed.css
197 ms
js.js
176 ms
widgets.js
448 ms
css
44 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
gplus-16.png
52 ms
body-bg.png
69 ms
logo-button.png
69 ms
inner-border-bg.png
69 ms
content-bg.png
132 ms
learn-to-use-wordpress.png
186 ms
triangle.png
82 ms
new-videos.png
152 ms
usp-easy-to-learn.png
135 ms
usp-one-time-payment.png
138 ms
usp-mobile-compatible.png
162 ms
teach-clients.png
199 ms
lifeguard-assistant.png
201 ms
gear.png
207 ms
33356085
199 ms
forest.png
713 ms
all.js
268 ms
plusone.js
77 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
11 ms
115 ms
xd_arbiter.php
209 ms
xd_arbiter.php
421 ms
ping
35 ms
like.php
65 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
481 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
542 ms
wplifeguard.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
wplifeguard.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
wplifeguard.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wplifeguard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wplifeguard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wplifeguard.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wplifeguard. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: