1.5 sec in total
235 ms
1.1 sec
187 ms
Visit wrapmatch.com now to see the best up-to-date Wrap Match content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wrapmatch.com
Visit wrapmatch.comWe analyzed Wrapmatch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 235 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
wrapmatch.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value740 ms
40/100
30%
Value0.078
95/100
15%
Value6.6 s
57/100
10%
235 ms
243 ms
51 ms
413 ms
212 ms
Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Wrapmatch.com, 11% (3 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (554 ms) belongs to the original domain Wrapmatch.com.
Page size can be reduced by 214.2 kB (57%)
374.1 kB
160.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Wrapmatch.com main page is 374.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 210.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 694 B, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.3 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Wrap Match needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.4 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 117.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 117.1 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 87.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wrapmatch.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 87.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (65%)
23
8
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wrap Match. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wrapmatch.com
235 ms
www.wrapmatch.com
243 ms
css
51 ms
bootstrap.min.css
413 ms
wm.css
212 ms
form.css
210 ms
jquery-1.8.2.min.js
471 ms
jquery.cookie.js
218 ms
bootstrap.min.js
329 ms
underscore-min.js
326 ms
mustache.js
326 ms
backbone-min.js
452 ms
backbone.analytics.js
370 ms
templates.js
424 ms
main.js
443 ms
wmlogo-trans.png
554 ms
conversion.js
37 ms
like.php
120 ms
Of-YZRAFweH.js
74 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
57 ms
Of-YZRAFweH.js
17 ms
bgtexture.jpg
108 ms
-KTKVm0Mx9ZCRXL9CXVIbaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
98 ms
ga.js
48 ms
61 ms
__utm.gif
24 ms
35 ms
wrapmatch.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
wrapmatch.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
wrapmatch.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wrapmatch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Wrapmatch.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
wrapmatch.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wrap Match. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: