Tools & Wizards About Us
zip.bg screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

zip.bg

?????? Zip.bg ? ?????? ? ???? ?? ??????????.

Page Load Speed

25.4 sec in total

First Response

525 ms

Resources Loaded

24.7 sec

Page Rendered

161 ms

zip.bg screenshot

About Website

Welcome to zip.bg homepage info - get ready to check Zip best content right away, or after learning these important things about zip.bg

Zip.bg

Visit zip.bg

Key Findings

We analyzed Zip.bg page load time and found that the first response time was 525 ms and then it took 24.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

zip.bg performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

login.php

525 ms

style.css

2355 ms

gemius.js

333 ms

kb.js

531 ms

common.js

537 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Zip.bg, 8% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Ad01.investor.bg. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.4 sec) relates to the external source Ad01.investor.bg.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 63.7 kB (76%)

Content Size

83.6 kB

After Optimization

19.8 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Zip.bg main page is 83.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 50.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 7.0 kB

  • Original 9.8 kB
  • After minification 9.4 kB
  • After compression 2.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.0 kB or 71% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 12.3 kB

  • Original 23.4 kB
  • After minification 21.8 kB
  • After compression 11.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 12.3 kB or 52% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 44.5 kB

  • Original 50.4 kB
  • After minification 24.1 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Zip.bg needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (50%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Zip. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

login.php

login.php

525 ms

style.css

style.css

2355 ms

gemius.js

gemius.js

333 ms

kb.js

kb.js

531 ms

common.js

common.js

537 ms

urchin.js

urchin.js

126 ms

adframe.php

adframe.php

20403 ms

bg_0.gif

bg_0.gif

298 ms

sh_left_bg.gif

sh_left_bg.gif

320 ms

sh_left_0.gif

sh_left_0.gif

320 ms

top_links.gif

top_links.gif

321 ms

under_tl.gif

under_tl.gif

321 ms

logo_bg.gif

logo_bg.gif

724 ms

under_mm_0.gif

under_mm_0.gif

646 ms

cont.gif

cont.gif

1133 ms

t1.gif

t1.gif

694 ms

bg_button.gif

bg_button.gif

723 ms

inv.gif

inv.gif

726 ms

bg_q_1.gif

bg_q_1.gif

1004 ms

bg_q_2.gif

bg_q_2.gif

1073 ms

bg_q_3.gif

bg_q_3.gif

1072 ms

sh_right_bg.gif

sh_right_bg.gif

1311 ms

sh_right_0.gif

sh_right_0.gif

1361 ms

footer_sp.gif

footer_sp.gif

1581 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

46 ms

SEO Factors

zip.bg SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Zip.bg can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Zip.bg main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

zip.bg

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Zip. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: