1.8 sec in total
126 ms
1.4 sec
262 ms
Click here to check amazing 1928 Wedding Planners content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 1928weddingplanners.com
Full-service Southwest Michigan wedding planners, helping couples with wedding planning for their amazing destination weddings and Michigan beach weddings.
Visit 1928weddingplanners.comWe analyzed 1928weddingplanners.com page load time and found that the first response time was 126 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
1928weddingplanners.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value14.5 s
0/100
25%
Value12.4 s
3/100
10%
Value850 ms
34/100
30%
Value0.457
19/100
15%
Value16.8 s
5/100
10%
126 ms
30 ms
57 ms
63 ms
62 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original 1928weddingplanners.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (865 ms) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 163.9 kB (11%)
1.5 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of 1928weddingplanners.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 701.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 89.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 1928 Wedding Planners images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 40.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 1928weddingplanners.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (75%)
79
20
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 1928 Wedding Planners. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
1928weddingplanners.com
126 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
30 ms
style.min.css
57 ms
settings.css
63 ms
style.css
62 ms
font-awesome.min.css
72 ms
datatables.min.css
59 ms
style.css
58 ms
plugins.min.css
67 ms
modules.min.css
95 ms
font-awesome.min.css
84 ms
style.min.css
86 ms
ionicons.min.css
89 ms
style.css
86 ms
style.css
94 ms
simple-line-icons.css
111 ms
dripicons.css
116 ms
style_dynamic.css
112 ms
modules-responsive.min.css
114 ms
blog-responsive.min.css
130 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
160 ms
js_composer.min.css
142 ms
css
35 ms
jetpack.css
130 ms
jquery.js
174 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
172 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
186 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
173 ms
jquery.bind-first-0.2.3.min.js
185 ms
js.cookie-2.1.3.min.js
208 ms
public.js
210 ms
external-tracking.min.js
211 ms
genericons.css
212 ms
photon.min.js
243 ms
2646291.js
87 ms
wpc-js.js
243 ms
jquery.dataTables.js
86 ms
gprofiles.js
67 ms
wpgroho.js
244 ms
core.min.js
242 ms
widget.min.js
245 ms
js
61 ms
e-202402.js
63 ms
tabs.min.js
244 ms
accordion.min.js
283 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
253 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
349 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
249 ms
third-party.min.js
392 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
247 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
386 ms
smoothPageScroll.js
367 ms
modules.min.js
366 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
364 ms
like.min.js
667 ms
wp-embed.min.js
681 ms
analytics.js
32 ms
2016-logo-.png
718 ms
jacinta-review-01-01.png
715 ms
Untitled3-444x444.png
762 ms
medsker-review-01.png
754 ms
april-testimonial.png
753 ms
laporte-testimonial-01.png
756 ms
2016-logo-01-e1484942939781.png
752 ms
AP_1178-e1553863565450.jpg
648 ms
Untitled4-388x388.png
755 ms
brides-padge.jpg
865 ms
midwestbridebadge.png
865 ms
theknot.jpg
756 ms
TWM-Badge_Square.png
805 ms
Untitled-1-391x391.png
802 ms
junebug-wedding.png
805 ms
linkid.js
428 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrc.woff
641 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDZbtU.woff
692 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedA.woff
693 ms
3y9I6aknfjLm_3lMKjiMgmUUYBs04aUXNxt9gW2LIfto9tWZeWGM.woff
751 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
592 ms
Genericons.svg
535 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
2 ms
2646291.js
626 ms
banner.js
625 ms
collectedforms.js
595 ms
collect
344 ms
collect
348 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
240 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
193 ms
js
79 ms
1928weddingplanners.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
1928weddingplanners.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
1928weddingplanners.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 1928weddingplanners.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 1928weddingplanners.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
1928weddingplanners.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 1928 Wedding Planners. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: