Tools & Wizards About Us
1stchoice.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

1stchoice.co.uk

Used Car Parts | Car Spares | Car Parts | 1st Choice

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

31 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

260 ms

1stchoice.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit 1stchoice.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date 1st Choice content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 1stchoice.co.uk

Used car parts online, cheap car spares and breakers yards: Find a part for sale, compare prices and buy for less from UK's No1 used parts suppliers.

Visit 1stchoice.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed 1stchoice.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 31 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

1stchoice.co.uk performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

23/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,320 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.214

58/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.8 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

1stchoice.co.uk

31 ms

1stchoice.co.uk

211 ms

www.1stchoice.co.uk

1403 ms

2KyztfphMVeRrmA6wb0LHAeJISI.js

34 ms

js

126 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 32% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original 1stchoice.co.uk, 13% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain 1stchoice.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 36.1 kB (5%)

Content Size

775.3 kB

After Optimization

739.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of 1stchoice.co.uk main page is 775.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 478.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 34.2 kB

  • Original 49.4 kB
  • After minification 49.4 kB
  • After compression 15.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.2 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 198.4 kB
  • After minification 198.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 1st Choice images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 478.8 kB
  • After minification 478.8 kB
  • After compression 476.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 15 B

  • Original 48.6 kB
  • After minification 48.6 kB
  • After compression 48.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 1stchoice.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (69%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 1st Choice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

1stchoice.co.uk

1stchoice.co.uk

31 ms

1stchoice.co.uk

1stchoice.co.uk

211 ms

www.1stchoice.co.uk

www.1stchoice.co.uk

1403 ms

2KyztfphMVeRrmA6wb0LHAeJISI.js

2KyztfphMVeRrmA6wb0LHAeJISI.js

34 ms

js

js

126 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

60 ms

cookieconsent.min.css

cookieconsent.min.css

65 ms

cookieconsent.min.js

cookieconsent.min.js

75 ms

app.css

app.css

179 ms

css

css

80 ms

api.js

api.js

80 ms

dist.js

dist.js

72 ms

cropper.css

cropper.css

66 ms

cropper.js

cropper.js

67 ms

app.js

app.js

84 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

64 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

69 ms

vedd3670a3b1c4e178fdfb0cc912d969e1713874337387

vedd3670a3b1c4e178fdfb0cc912d969e1713874337387

121 ms

nMw4wCJpzZrQNFcBS3i_klnnS-I.js

nMw4wCJpzZrQNFcBS3i_klnnS-I.js

51 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

61 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

302 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

398 ms

snippet

snippet

457 ms

bg-homepage.jpg

bg-homepage.jpg

415 ms

brand-logo.png

brand-logo.png

247 ms

brand-logo2.png

brand-logo2.png

247 ms

find-us-on-facebook.png

find-us-on-facebook.png

247 ms

vra-logo.png

vra-logo.png

245 ms

wheat-car-bg.jpg

wheat-car-bg.jpg

265 ms

js

js

237 ms

widget

widget

162 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

360 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

381 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

401 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

399 ms

platform.js

platform.js

217 ms

collect

collect

159 ms

bat.js

bat.js

195 ms

update.min.js

update.min.js

179 ms

collect

collect

120 ms

anchor

anchor

84 ms

main.js

main.js

26 ms

js

js

70 ms

4021139.js

4021139.js

36 ms

update.show.min.js

update.show.min.js

31 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

29 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

33 ms

tKcPQSh2okjZHiZ2jIssRExVWo45mlVHOakavsOpwK4.js

tKcPQSh2okjZHiZ2jIssRExVWo45mlVHOakavsOpwK4.js

69 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

64 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

51 ms

4021139

4021139

101 ms

c.png

c.png

52 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

26 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

28 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

27 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

23 ms

Accessibility Review

1stchoice.co.uk accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

1stchoice.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

1stchoice.co.uk SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 1stchoice.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 1stchoice.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

1stchoice.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 1st Choice. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: