Analyze

2017project.org: Home - THE 2017 PROJECT THE 2017 PROJECT

Working to advance a conservative reform agenda

Page load speed analysis

  • 67/100

    Normal result
  • 7

    Successful tests
  • 1

    Failed test
  • First response

    823 ms

  • Resources loaded

    2 sec

  • Page rendered

    376 ms

  • Total page load time

    3.2 sec

Welcome to 2017project.org homepage info - get ready to check 2017 PROJECT best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about 2017project.org

We analyzed 2017project.org page load time and found that the first response time was 823 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Page optimization

  • HTML 68.7 kB
    Images 345.7 kB
    Javascripts 868.6 kB
    CSS 55.4 kB

    In fact, the total size of 2017project.org main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 868.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

    • Original 68.7 kB
    • After minification 64.8 kB
    • After compression 20.1 kB

    HTML optimization

    HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.5 kB or 71% of the original size.

    • Original 345.7 kB
    • After optimization 311.0 kB

    Image optimization

    Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 2017 PROJECT images are well optimized though.

    • Original 868.6 kB
    • After minification 831.3 kB
    • After compression 266.3 kB

    JavaScript optimization

    It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 602.3 kB or 69% of the original size.

    • Original 55.4 kB
    • After minification 44.7 kB
    • After compression 10.2 kB

    CSS optimization

    CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 2017project.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 45.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Network requests diagram

  • 2017project.org
  • all.css
  • style.css
  • css
  • css
  • widget.css
  • flick.css
  • 2017project.org
  • jquery.js
  • jquery-migrate.min.js
  • scrollTo.js
  • jquery.form.min.js
  • mailchimp.js
  • core.min.js
  • datepicker.js
  • style.css
  • jquery.main.js
  • buttons.js
  • script.js
  • wp-embed.min.js
  • addthis_widget.js
  • wp-emoji-release.min.js
  • analytics.js
  • bg-body.png
  • bg-wrapper.png
  • logo.png
  • sprite.png
  • bg-decor.png
  • policy-proposal-redbanner_healthcare-300x245.jpg
  • bg-mask.png
  • US-capitol-300x245.jpg
  • Election-300x245.jpg
  • President_Reagan_giving_Campaign_speech_in_Austin_Texas_1984-220x128.jpg
  • CSPAN-219x144.png
  • bg-widget.png
  • bullet.png
  • 300lo.json
  • getAllAppDefault.esi
  • zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
  • d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
  • mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
  • sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
  • collect
  • getSegment.php
  • checkOAuth.esi
  • t.dhj
  • t.dhj
  • cm
  • x35248
  • s-3271.xgi
  • hbpix
  • xrefid.xgi
  • pixel
  • pixel
  • 2981

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original 2017project.org, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Wd-edge.sharethis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (823 ms) belongs to the original domain 2017project.org.

Additional info on 2017project.org

Requests

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 2017 PROJECT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

17

Javascripts

21

Images

8

CSS

5

AJAX

51

All

Possible request optimization

1

Javascripts

10

Images

1

CSS

5

AJAX

34

Optimized

17

All

Normal result

IP address

2017project.org uses IP address which is currently shared with 4 other domains. The more sites share the same IP address, the higher the host server’s workload is. It is strongly recommended that the host server should be changed or the hosting provider should be requested to give a different (separate) IP address for this domain.

Poor result

IP Trace

2017project.org

tradewindsfruitstore.com

pizzaboys.com

gourmetexpress.com.sv

paesanspizza.com

50.62.253.1

DNS records

Type Host Target/ip TTL Other
A

2017project.org

50.62.253.1 600
NS

2017project.org

ns31.domaincontrol.com 3600
NS

2017project.org

ns32.domaincontrol.com 3600
SOA

2017project.org

600 Mname: ns31.domaincontrol.com
Rname: dns.jomax.net
Serial: 2016081700
Refresh: 28800
Retry: 7200
Expire: 604800
Minimum-ttl: 600
MX

2017project.org

2017project-org.mail.protection.outlook.com 3600 Pri: 0

Language and encoding

Good result

Language

EN en language flag

Detected

EN en language flag

Claimed

Encoding

UTF-8

Claimed

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 2017project.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 2017project.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

HTTPS certificate

SSL Certificate

2017project.org has no SSL certificate. Web browsing can be safer with HTTPS connection, so we suggest that it should be obtained for this site.

Normal result

Visitor World Map

Country of origin for 100% of all visits is United States. It’s good for 2017project.org that their server is also located in United States, as that enables the majority of their visitors to benefit from a much faster page load time.

Good result

Normal result

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 2017 PROJECT. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

2017project.org

Share this report in social media

Analyze another website

Analyze