4.6 sec in total
692 ms
2.8 sec
1 sec
Visit 50em.com now to see the best up-to-date 50 Em content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 50em.com
Unbiased Review of Infusionsoft or Ontraport (Office Autopilot) for Business and Marketing Automation from Someone Who Uses them Both Every Day.
Visit 50em.comWe analyzed 50em.com page load time and found that the first response time was 692 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
50em.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value4.0 s
49/100
25%
Value3.9 s
83/100
10%
Value670 ms
44/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.2 s
25/100
10%
692 ms
142 ms
25 ms
141 ms
172 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 23% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original 50em.com, 13% (5 requests) were made to 50em.wufoo.com and 13% (5 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (692 ms) belongs to the original domain 50em.com.
Page size can be reduced by 294.8 kB (42%)
710.3 kB
415.5 kB
In fact, the total size of 50em.com main page is 710.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 523.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.2 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, 50 Em needs image optimization as it can save up to 16.6 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 188.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 188.0 kB or 36% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 70.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 50em.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 70.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (79%)
33
7
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 50 Em. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.50em.com
692 ms
css.css
142 ms
style.css
25 ms
jquery.js
141 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
172 ms
script.min.js
22 ms
E-v1.js
242 ms
539 ms
gtm.js
126 ms
noise.png
53 ms
infusionsoftvsontraport.png
213 ms
sw-icon-font.woff
150 ms
analytics.js
63 ms
js
109 ms
fbds.js
119 ms
tracking.js
353 ms
collect
33 ms
collect
104 ms
67 ms
ga-audiences
48 ms
in.php
281 ms
index.0266.css
98 ms
theme.css
200 ms
dynamic.0266.js
368 ms
fieldbg.gif
98 ms
roundtrip.js
26 ms
track.php
402 ms
4 ms
6FI5AASLOBHNJMKMLXWQZ7.js
135 ms
fbevents.hashing.js
9 ms
out
19 ms
50 ms
out
19 ms
22 ms
23 ms
u.php
70 ms
17 ms
27 ms
377928.gif
7 ms
50em.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
50em.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
50em.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 50em.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 50em.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
50em.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 50 Em. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: