2.9 sec in total
661 ms
1.8 sec
390 ms
Welcome to 561websitedesign.com homepage info - get ready to check 561 Website Design best content right away, or after learning these important things about 561websitedesign.com
At 561 Website Design, we specialize in custom website design, web development and SEO solutions for our local clients in Jupiter, Miami, Boca Raton, West Palm Beach US.
Visit 561websitedesign.comWe analyzed 561websitedesign.com page load time and found that the first response time was 661 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
561websitedesign.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value12.2 s
0/100
25%
Value9.9 s
9/100
10%
Value950 ms
29/100
30%
Value0.046
99/100
15%
Value16.4 s
5/100
10%
661 ms
22 ms
41 ms
51 ms
54 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original 561websitedesign.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (661 ms) belongs to the original domain 561websitedesign.com.
Page size can be reduced by 233.1 kB (16%)
1.5 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of 561websitedesign.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 551.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 106.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 106.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 561 Website Design images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 88.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 561websitedesign.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 88.4 kB or 32% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (68%)
69
22
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 561 Website Design. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.561websitedesign.com
661 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
22 ms
style.min.css
41 ms
styles.css
51 ms
settings.css
54 ms
fontello.css
52 ms
pagenavi-css.css
52 ms
master.css
60 ms
css
67 ms
all.css
56 ms
jquery-3.6.0.min.js
81 ms
jquery-migrate-3.3.2.min.js
68 ms
rbtools.min.js
97 ms
rs6.min.js
100 ms
noscroll.js
71 ms
js
98 ms
home.js
67 ms
jquery.esgbox.min.css
76 ms
rs6.css
82 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
80 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
91 ms
index.js
92 ms
jquery.plugins.js
116 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
96 ms
webnus-custom.js
105 ms
api.js
44 ms
index.js
106 ms
live-search.js
108 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
111 ms
esg.min.js
113 ms
esgbox.min.js
135 ms
waypoints.min.js
120 ms
js_composer.min.css
92 ms
visualcomposer.css
72 ms
base.css
77 ms
scaffolding.css
75 ms
blox.css
81 ms
fancybox.css
86 ms
flexslider.css
90 ms
iconfonts.css
111 ms
blog.css
112 ms
elements.css
121 ms
widgets.css
113 ms
icon-box.css
116 ms
live-search.css
114 ms
whmcs.css
117 ms
main-menu.css
115 ms
main-style.css
127 ms
color-skins.css
128 ms
bdbg1.png
47 ms
new-logo.png
47 ms
webdesign-icon.png
47 ms
graphic-design-icon.png
45 ms
seo-op.png
47 ms
online-marketing.png
47 ms
circle1.jpg
49 ms
circle2.jpg
48 ms
circle3.jpg
48 ms
300x200transparent.png
47 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlEA.ttf
82 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEA.ttf
82 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlEA.ttf
122 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedw.ttf
144 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1JlEA.ttf
143 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
122 ms
Simple-Line-Icons.ttf
97 ms
spattern.png
97 ms
home.jpg
143 ms
underline1.png
96 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
54 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
79 ms
email-icon1.png
54 ms
Sign-up-button.png
23 ms
linecons.woff
39 ms
facebook1.png
27 ms
Instagram-Icon-e1647460508767.png
27 ms
linkedin1.png
26 ms
twitter1.png
27 ms
address-footer.jpg
21 ms
recaptcha__en.js
26 ms
561websitedesign.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
561websitedesign.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
561websitedesign.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 561websitedesign.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 561websitedesign.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
561websitedesign.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 561 Website Design. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: