Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

60by80.com

QUEEN SIZED TRAVEL

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

192 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

575 ms

60by80.com screenshot

About Website

Visit 60by80.com now to see the best up-to-date 60 By 80 content for Brazil and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 60by80.com

Boutique-slash-bookstore-slash-art space. Meh. But as a café, this Barcelona concept store excels.

Visit 60by80.com

Key Findings

We analyzed 60by80.com page load time and found that the first response time was 192 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

60by80.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

31/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.8 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,110 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.032

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.3 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

60by80.com

192 ms

www.60by80.com

2038 ms

css

46 ms

jquery.min.js

227 ms

jquery.min.js

86 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original 60by80.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain 60by80.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 336.1 kB (28%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

880.6 kB

In fact, the total size of 60by80.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 767.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 43.1 kB

  • Original 53.5 kB
  • After minification 51.6 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 21.6 kB

  • Original 767.4 kB
  • After minification 745.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 60 By 80 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 214.6 kB

  • Original 330.5 kB
  • After minification 324.4 kB
  • After compression 115.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 214.6 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 56.8 kB

  • Original 65.4 kB
  • After minification 49.3 kB
  • After compression 8.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 60by80.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 56.8 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (24%)

Requests Now

71

After Optimization

54

The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 60 By 80. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

60by80.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

60by80.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

60by80.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 60by80.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 60by80.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 60 By 80. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: