5.5 sec in total
777 ms
4 sec
658 ms
Click here to check amazing 6Harf content for Turkey. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 6harf.com
Kullanıcı odaklı web tasarım, yazılım ve danışmanlık hizmetleriyle, dijital performansınızı arttırıyor ve dijital varlıklarınızı modern dünyaya uyarlıyoruz.
Visit 6harf.comWe analyzed 6harf.com page load time and found that the first response time was 777 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
6harf.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value8.0 s
3/100
25%
Value10.8 s
6/100
10%
Value6,440 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value15.3 s
7/100
10%
777 ms
765 ms
1076 ms
271 ms
412 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original 6harf.com, 12% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain 6harf.com.
Page size can be reduced by 606.0 kB (26%)
2.3 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of 6harf.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.8 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 226.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, 6Harf needs image optimization as it can save up to 226.9 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 146.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 146.8 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 197.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 6harf.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 197.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (33%)
75
50
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 6Harf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
6harf.com
777 ms
jquery.min.js
765 ms
bootstrap.css
1076 ms
bootstrap-submenu.css
271 ms
bootstrap.min.js
412 ms
bootstrap-submenu.min.js
284 ms
font-awesome.min.css
675 ms
toastr.css
423 ms
toastr.min.js
425 ms
app.css
548 ms
header.css
565 ms
page.header.css
565 ms
navigation.css
684 ms
footer.css
706 ms
home_page.css
705 ms
owl.theme.css
808 ms
owl.carousel.css
818 ms
owl.transitions.css
847 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
989 ms
app.js
889 ms
ajaxform.js
1100 ms
colors.css
954 ms
css
77 ms
css
86 ms
defined.css
145 ms
widget.css
137 ms
6harf-logo.png
311 ms
slider_1451063812.png
947 ms
s1-1.png
220 ms
s1-2.png
220 ms
s1-3.png
221 ms
s1-4.png
218 ms
s2-1.png
466 ms
s2-2.png
478 ms
s2-3.png
632 ms
s2-4.png
480 ms
content_thumb_1453988573.png
728 ms
content_thumb_1453988338.png
720 ms
content_thumb_1453988410.png
880 ms
content_thumb_1453988447.png
888 ms
content_thumb_1453988474.png
1336 ms
content_thumb_1453988500.png
1228 ms
content_thumb_1453988532.png
1298 ms
s4-1.png
1015 ms
s4-2.png
1023 ms
s4-3.png
1078 ms
s4-4.png
1149 ms
s4-5.png
1159 ms
s4-6.png
1213 ms
s4-7.png
1283 ms
s5-bg.png
1572 ms
ref_1453989272.png
1348 ms
ref_1453989202.png
1357 ms
ref_1453989101.png
1420 ms
ref_1450703575.png
1441 ms
ref_1450703356.png
1621 ms
ref_1450703242.png
1487 ms
ref_1450702414.png
1484 ms
ref_1450702190.png
1560 ms
ref_1450701766.png
1583 ms
ref_1450701664.png
1617 ms
sdk.js
77 ms
ref_1450701553.png
1626 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
182 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
200 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
201 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
198 ms
dazS1PrQQuCxC3iOAJFEJZ_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
183 ms
y7lebkjgREBJK96VQi37Zp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
183 ms
dazS1PrQQuCxC3iOAJFEJbfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf
185 ms
t6Nd4cfPRhZP44Q5QAjcC50EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
100 ms
OLffGBTaF0XFOW1gnuHF0Z0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
99 ms
W4wDsBUluyw0tK3tykhXEfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
149 ms
7m8l7TlFO-S3VkhHuR0at50EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
150 ms
analytics.js
83 ms
191 ms
xd_arbiter.php
94 ms
xd_arbiter.php
125 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1758 ms
ref_1450700992.png
1495 ms
ref_1450700860.png
1519 ms
ref_1450700693.png
1532 ms
collect
34 ms
collect
58 ms
ref_1450700429.png
1598 ms
ga-audiences
38 ms
ref_1450700364.png
1306 ms
logo-footer.png
1375 ms
s4-bg.jpg
1682 ms
foot-map.jpg
1637 ms
6harf.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
6harf.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
6harf.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
TR
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 6harf.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Turkish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that 6harf.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
6harf.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 6Harf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: