3.6 sec in total
155 ms
2.9 sec
527 ms
Visit 72point.com now to see the best up-to-date 72 Point content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 72point.com
Want more media exposure? We generate earned media coverage for PR agencies and brands with survey-led news stories.
Visit 72point.comWe analyzed 72point.com page load time and found that the first response time was 155 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
72point.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.2 s
0/100
10%
Value39.0 s
0/100
25%
Value13.8 s
1/100
10%
Value4,080 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.07
96/100
15%
Value18.9 s
3/100
10%
155 ms
107 ms
25 ms
33 ms
33 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original 72point.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Analytics.twitter.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (58%)
4.0 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of 72point.com main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 95.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 72 Point images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 596.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 596.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.6 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 72point.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.6 MB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (36%)
86
55
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 72 Point. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
72point.com
155 ms
42600.js
107 ms
styles.css
25 ms
go_pricing_styles.css
33 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
33 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
39 ms
tp_twitter_plugin.css
48 ms
settings.css
49 ms
js_composer.css
174 ms
css
27 ms
main.min.css
146 ms
font-awesome.min.css
47 ms
fontello.css
52 ms
main-80fa399ac2.css
70 ms
custom-c9edfa7ee7.css
216 ms
media-9d84988269.css
62 ms
style.css
66 ms
jquery.js
169 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
81 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
231 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
169 ms
above-the-fold.min.js
213 ms
oct.js
57 ms
jquery.form.min.js
225 ms
scripts.js
226 ms
go_pricing_scripts.js
228 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
240 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
226 ms
main.min.js
294 ms
wp-embed.min.js
240 ms
js_composer_front.js
241 ms
analytics.js
128 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
120 ms
style.css
106 ms
collect
78 ms
skin01r.general-boxed-bg-image.jpg
45 ms
slider_art.jpg
101 ms
blank.gif
41 ms
slider_pioneers.jpg
21 ms
slider_exposure.jpg
43 ms
viusal_content.gif
41 ms
slider_broadcast.jpg
45 ms
prca@2x.png
43 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
79 ms
STBOO2waD2LpX45SXYjQBRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
80 ms
WmVKXVcOuffP_qmCpFuyzRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
79 ms
Li18TEFObx_yGdzKDoI_chsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
80 ms
vQbQAx9WlNOTTgpOnfyPXQ.woff
80 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
39 ms
adsct
1404 ms
adsct
1332 ms
loader.gif
1139 ms
2zo9l54.png
1192 ms
large_left.png
71 ms
large_right.png
71 ms
72point_red.png
68 ms
video-406x270.jpg
68 ms
mobiles-resize-435x270.jpg
70 ms
winner-404x270.jpg
71 ms
newyear_resolution2-345x270.jpg
72 ms
christmas-2-338x270.jpg
72 ms
death-of-news-452x270.jpg
97 ms
energy-446x315.jpg
74 ms
band1_web-750x568-446x338.jpg
98 ms
header-image-for-the-site-446x297.jpg
71 ms
critical-woman-446x496.jpg
95 ms
no-signal-weight-watchers-446x421.jpg
96 ms
allowance-446x299.jpg
94 ms
bored-446x501.jpg
106 ms
office-romance-446x339.jpg
97 ms
competitive-mums-crop-446x484.jpg
106 ms
old-man-phone-filter-446x297.jpg
116 ms
junk-446x670.jpg
192 ms
image-446x297.jpg
108 ms
empowering-women-446x452.jpg
102 ms
squirrell-umbrella-446x369.jpg
118 ms
money-446x296.jpg
127 ms
coffee_crop-446x385.jpg
118 ms
onepoll_black_clientlogo.png
127 ms
swns_bw1.png
130 ms
drenchlogo_black.png
131 ms
swnsdigital_black3.png
132 ms
talk_to_pres.jpg
185 ms
video-40x40.jpg
185 ms
mobiles-resize-40x40.jpg
146 ms
winner-40x40.jpg
147 ms
newyear_resolution2-40x40.jpg
183 ms
footer_logo.png
185 ms
grab.png
128 ms
small_logo.png
128 ms
slider_broadcast-320x200.jpg
17 ms
slider_pioneers-320x200.jpg
25 ms
72point.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
72point.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
72point.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 72point.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 72point.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
72point.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 72 Point. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: