Tools & Wizards About Us
79up.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 88

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

79up.com

79up.com - This website is for sale! - 79up Resources and Information.

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

181 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

156 ms

79up.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to 79up.com homepage info - get ready to check 79 Up best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about 79up.com

This website is for sale! 79up.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, 79up.com has it all. ...

Visit 79up.com

Key Findings

We analyzed 79up.com page load time and found that the first response time was 181 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

79up.com performance score

88

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.0 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.208

60/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.1 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

79up.com

181 ms

www.79up.com

73 ms

www.sitereport.xyz

229 ms

jquery.min.js

139 ms

bootstrap.min.js

83 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original 79up.com, 58% (15 requests) were made to Sitereport.xyz and 15% (4 requests) were made to Free.pagepeeker.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (229 ms) relates to the external source Sitereport.xyz.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 240.6 kB (60%)

Content Size

401.2 kB

After Optimization

160.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of 79up.com main page is 401.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 186.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 11.1 kB

  • Original 14.7 kB
  • After minification 13.2 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.1 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 71 B

  • Original 69.5 kB
  • After minification 69.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 79 Up images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 121.9 kB

  • Original 186.8 kB
  • After minification 184.7 kB
  • After compression 64.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 121.9 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 107.5 kB

  • Original 130.2 kB
  • After minification 128.3 kB
  • After compression 22.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 79up.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 107.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (45%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 79 Up. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

79up.com

79up.com

181 ms

www.79up.com

www.79up.com

73 ms

www.sitereport.xyz

www.sitereport.xyz

229 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

139 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

83 ms

base.js

base.js

56 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

131 ms

bootstrap-responsive.min.css

bootstrap-responsive.min.css

82 ms

app.css

app.css

58 ms

cookieconsent.latest.min.js

cookieconsent.latest.min.js

58 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

21 ms

thumbs.php

thumbs.php

207 ms

thumbs.php

thumbs.php

198 ms

thumbs.php

thumbs.php

202 ms

content.png

content.png

30 ms

tags.png

tags.png

34 ms

link.png

link.png

32 ms

speed.png

speed.png

34 ms

advice.png

advice.png

31 ms

review.png

review.png

28 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

75 ms

thumbs.php

thumbs.php

199 ms

collect

collect

11 ms

thumbs.php

thumbs.php

97 ms

thumbs.php

thumbs.php

103 ms

dark-top.css

dark-top.css

11 ms

Accessibility Review

79up.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

79up.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

79up.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 79up.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 79up.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

79up.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 79 Up. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: