3 sec in total
935 ms
1.7 sec
341 ms
Visit 8020.net now to see the best up-to-date 80 20 content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 8020.net
T-Slots, aluminum extrusions, and parts. Architectural solutions and frames for industrial machine guards, workstations, data center enclosures, and more. Build your idea with 80/20 today.
Visit 8020.netWe analyzed 8020.net page load time and found that the first response time was 935 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
8020.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
73/100
10%
Value9.5 s
0/100
25%
Value10.4 s
8/100
10%
Value790 ms
37/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value18.7 s
3/100
10%
935 ms
26 ms
22 ms
17 ms
19 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original 8020.net, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Static.ctctcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (935 ms) belongs to the original domain 8020.net.
Page size can be reduced by 967.2 kB (26%)
3.7 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of 8020.net main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.6 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 135.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 80 20 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 589.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 589.2 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 204.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 8020.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 204.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (46%)
65
35
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 80 20. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
8020.net
935 ms
styles.css
26 ms
colorbox.css
22 ms
widgets.css
17 ms
galleriffic-2.css
19 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
39 ms
freetextsearch.css
38 ms
easytabs.css
41 ms
prototype.js
62 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
57 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
103 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
58 ms
noconflict.js
59 ms
ccard.js
59 ms
validation.js
99 ms
builder.js
101 ms
effects.js
136 ms
dragdrop.js
99 ms
controls.js
142 ms
slider.js
147 ms
js.js
145 ms
form.js
144 ms
menu.js
149 ms
translate.js
153 ms
cookies.js
153 ms
brightcove_experience.js
153 ms
easytabs.js
155 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
166 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
165 ms
signup-form.js
172 ms
analytics.js
114 ms
8020_bg-jpg.jpg
97 ms
header-img.png
99 ms
8020_logo_official.jpg
91 ms
nav-container-resized.png
92 ms
main-link.png
92 ms
search_icon.png
91 ms
notext_slide1.png
121 ms
notext_slide2.png
133 ms
notext_slide3.png
131 ms
notext_slide4.png
131 ms
home-img7.png
109 ms
home-img6.png
221 ms
notext_home-img1.png
228 ms
notext_home-img2.png
231 ms
notext_home-img3.png
234 ms
home-img4.png
237 ms
XDIY1602_home.png
239 ms
footer-lookup.png
234 ms
footer-newsletter.png
237 ms
footer-requests.png
240 ms
footer-catalog.png
243 ms
facebook.png
243 ms
twitter.png
243 ms
linkedin.png
246 ms
android.png
247 ms
youtube.png
250 ms
pinterest.png
249 ms
googleplus.png
249 ms
apple.png
250 ms
pager.png
245 ms
overlay.png
202 ms
bx_loader.gif
202 ms
widget_v2.132.js
33 ms
collect
102 ms
print.css
6 ms
8020.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
8020.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
8020.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 8020.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 8020.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
8020.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 80 20. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: