Tools & Wizards About Us
99ranking.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

99ranking.com

Новый сайт успешно создан и готов к работе

Page Load Speed

20.6 sec in total

First Response

421 ms

Resources Loaded

17.3 sec

Page Rendered

2.9 sec

99ranking.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to 99ranking.com homepage info - get ready to check 99 Ranking best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about 99ranking.com

Not getting enough traffic? You've been missing out on something important, that's what we're helping you with. Call us to get closer building successful brand.

Visit 99ranking.com

Key Findings

We analyzed 99ranking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 421 ms and then it took 20.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

99ranking.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

99ranking.com

421 ms

99ranking.com

15848 ms

font-awesome.min.css

37 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

58 ms

style.min.css

114 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original 99ranking.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (15.8 sec) belongs to the original domain 99ranking.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 169.4 kB (15%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

986.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of 99ranking.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 754.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 96.5 kB

  • Original 116.5 kB
  • After minification 108.7 kB
  • After compression 20.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 63.5 kB

  • Original 754.2 kB
  • After minification 690.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 99 Ranking images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 123.9 kB
  • After minification 123.9 kB
  • After compression 120.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 6.1 kB

  • Original 161.4 kB
  • After minification 161.4 kB
  • After compression 155.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 99ranking.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (71%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 99 Ranking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

99ranking.com

99ranking.com

421 ms

99ranking.com

99ranking.com

15848 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

37 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

58 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

114 ms

styles.css

styles.css

164 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

169 ms

flatpickr.min.css

flatpickr.min.css

175 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

187 ms

style.css

style.css

177 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

188 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

272 ms

post-476.css

post-476.css

221 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

228 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

224 ms

style.css

style.css

231 ms

global.css

global.css

233 ms

post-44.css

post-44.css

286 ms

widget-styles.css

widget-styles.css

294 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

287 ms

css

css

36 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

326 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

332 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

379 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

344 ms

flatpickr.min.js

flatpickr.min.js

345 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

346 ms

index.js

index.js

351 ms

js

js

51 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

347 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

527 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

526 ms

index.js

index.js

527 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

528 ms

frontend-script.js

frontend-script.js

528 ms

widget-scripts.js

widget-scripts.js

533 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

529 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

533 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

534 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

535 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

535 ms

animate-circle.js

animate-circle.js

495 ms

elementor.js

elementor.js

434 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

493 ms

Main-Logo-blue-text.png

Main-Logo-blue-text.png

246 ms

SEO-Tips.webp

SEO-Tips.webp

246 ms

SEO-Guide-150x150.png

SEO-Guide-150x150.png

122 ms

SEO-Advance-150x150.png

SEO-Advance-150x150.png

296 ms

SEO-For-You-150x150.png

SEO-For-You-150x150.png

122 ms

About-us-1024x638.png

About-us-1024x638.png

343 ms

WordPress-Post-vs-Page.jpg

WordPress-Post-vs-Page.jpg

340 ms

Semrush-Review.jpg

Semrush-Review.jpg

340 ms

SiteGround-Review.jpg

SiteGround-Review.jpg

295 ms

Thrive-Themes-Review.jpg

Thrive-Themes-Review.jpg

294 ms

Bluehost-Review.jpg

Bluehost-Review.jpg

344 ms

Best-Off-page-SEO-techniques.jpg

Best-Off-page-SEO-techniques.jpg

416 ms

Email-NewsLatters-2.png

Email-NewsLatters-2.png

341 ms

Main-Logo-blue-text-989x1024.png

Main-Logo-blue-text-989x1024.png

459 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

179 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

127 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

299 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

238 ms

collect

collect

18 ms

print.css

print.css

55 ms

SEO Factors

99ranking.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 99ranking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that 99ranking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

99ranking.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 99 Ranking. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: