Tools & Wizards About Us
aajtakresult.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

aajtakresult.in

Sarkari Result | Aajtak Result

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

20 ms

Resources Loaded

4.5 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

aajtakresult.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to aajtakresult.in homepage info - get ready to check Aajtak Result best content right away, or after learning these important things about aajtakresult.in

Visit aajtakresult.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Aajtakresult.in page load time and found that the first response time was 20 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

aajtakresult.in performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.8 s

35/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

aajtakresult.in

20 ms

aajtakresult.com

349 ms

style.min.css

221 ms

css

60 ms

bootstrap.css

382 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Aajtakresult.in, 84% (36 requests) were made to Aajtakresult.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (985 ms) relates to the external source Aajtakresult.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 124.3 kB (17%)

Content Size

718.7 kB

After Optimization

594.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Aajtakresult.in main page is 718.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 423.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 101.3 kB

  • Original 112.6 kB
  • After minification 85.7 kB
  • After compression 11.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 26.9 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 101.3 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 423.2 kB
  • After minification 423.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Aajtak Result images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 13.8 kB

  • Original 88.1 kB
  • After minification 88.1 kB
  • After compression 74.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 13.8 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 9.2 kB

  • Original 94.9 kB
  • After minification 94.9 kB
  • After compression 85.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Aajtakresult.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (60%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Aajtak Result. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

aajtakresult.in

aajtakresult.in

20 ms

aajtakresult.com

aajtakresult.com

349 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

221 ms

css

css

60 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

382 ms

style.css

style.css

294 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

392 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

287 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

305 ms

jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap.css

jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap.css

441 ms

customizer.css

customizer.css

510 ms

style.css

style.css

503 ms

style.css

style.css

514 ms

default.css

default.css

586 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

684 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

651 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

728 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

816 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

735 ms

jquery.smartmenus.js

jquery.smartmenus.js

843 ms

jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap.js

jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap.js

867 ms

jquery.marquee.js

jquery.marquee.js

895 ms

main.js

main.js

954 ms

js

js

96 ms

custom.js

custom.js

944 ms

head-back.jpg

head-back.jpg

477 ms

Logopit_1544732440122.webp

Logopit_1544732440122.webp

344 ms

Logopit_1677949911974-2.jpg

Logopit_1677949911974-2.jpg

392 ms

Logopit_1670408159934-2.jpg

Logopit_1670408159934-2.jpg

403 ms

logopit_154973068525_6oMeC.jpg

logopit_154973068525_6oMeC.jpg

363 ms

Logopit_1550035204994-257E2.jpg

Logopit_1550035204994-257E2.jpg

364 ms

logopit_154969578092_RBjfi.jpg

logopit_154969578092_RBjfi.jpg

707 ms

logopit_154973061216_AR5xN.jpg

logopit_154973061216_AR5xN.jpg

727 ms

Logopit_1550844949554-257E2.jpg

Logopit_1550844949554-257E2.jpg

668 ms

Logopit_1550035265129-257E2.jpg

Logopit_1550035265129-257E2.jpg

696 ms

Logopit_1550051225599-257E2.jpg

Logopit_1550051225599-257E2.jpg

702 ms

logopit_154972389752_yKxHg.jpg

logopit_154972389752_yKxHg.jpg

812 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

985 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

861 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf

81 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aX8.ttf

134 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf

135 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf

134 ms

Accessibility Review

aajtakresult.in accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

aajtakresult.in best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

aajtakresult.in SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aajtakresult.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Aajtakresult.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

aajtakresult.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Aajtak Result. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: