Tools & Wizards About Us
acceptediting.tw screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

acceptediting.tw

acceptediting 艾思特科學編修 | 專業學術英文編修翻譯

Page Load Speed

13.2 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

11.6 sec

Page Rendered

114 ms

acceptediting.tw screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Acceptediting content for Taiwan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about acceptediting.tw

艾思特科學編修提供專業英文編修與翻譯，以及期刊出版服務，協助學者與研究者發表期刊論文，替台灣學術界盡一份心力。

Visit acceptediting.tw

Key Findings

We analyzed Acceptediting.tw page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 11.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

acceptediting.tw performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

77/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value390 ms

69/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.9 s

66/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

acceptediting.tw

1453 ms

plusone.js

83 ms

colorbox.css

467 ms

q-a-plus.css

493 ms

nivo-slider.css

493 ms

Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Acceptediting.tw, 10% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Acceptediting.tw.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 301.3 kB (17%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Acceptediting.tw main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 19.0 kB

  • Original 26.9 kB
  • After minification 26.0 kB
  • After compression 7.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.0 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 61.8 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Acceptediting images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 129.4 kB

  • Original 213.3 kB
  • After minification 209.3 kB
  • After compression 83.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 129.4 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 91.2 kB

  • Original 105.8 kB
  • After minification 83.0 kB
  • After compression 14.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Acceptediting.tw needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 91.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (75%)

Requests Now

81

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Acceptediting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

acceptediting.tw

acceptediting.tw

1453 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

83 ms

colorbox.css

colorbox.css

467 ms

q-a-plus.css

q-a-plus.css

493 ms

nivo-slider.css

nivo-slider.css

493 ms

styles.css

styles.css

462 ms

eg-attachments.css

eg-attachments.css

481 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

717 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1340 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

723 ms

jquery.colorbox-min.js

jquery.colorbox-min.js

1556 ms

announcement-ticker-highlighter-scroller.js

announcement-ticker-highlighter-scroller.js

741 ms

jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js

jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js

742 ms

base.css

base.css

992 ms

layout.css

layout.css

1483 ms

menus.css

menus.css

997 ms

modules.css

modules.css

998 ms

tools.css

tools.css

1263 ms

system.css

system.css

1244 ms

extensions.css

extensions.css

1245 ms

custom.css

custom.css

1498 ms

lucida.css

lucida.css

1504 ms

lucida.css

lucida.css

1527 ms

lucida.css

lucida.css

1578 ms

style.css

style.css

1740 ms

print.css

print.css

1754 ms

warp.js

warp.js

1757 ms

accordionmenu.js

accordionmenu.js

1793 ms

dropdownmenu.js

dropdownmenu.js

1804 ms

template.js

template.js

1826 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

5 ms

q-a-plus.js

q-a-plus.js

1820 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

2035 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

1840 ms

public.min.js

public.min.js

1892 ms

base.css

base.css

533 ms

layout.css

layout.css

545 ms

menus.css

menus.css

713 ms

modules.css

modules.css

730 ms

tools.css

tools.css

797 ms

system.css

system.css

795 ms

system.css

system.css

797 ms

system-all.css

system-all.css

924 ms

print.css

print.css

763 ms

ga.js

ga.js

17 ms

header.jpg

header.jpg

5609 ms

page_white_edit.png

page_white_edit.png

316 ms

target.png

target.png

316 ms

doc_text_image.png

doc_text_image.png

317 ms

photos.png

photos.png

316 ms

upload-icon16.png

upload-icon16.png

317 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

514 ms

Slide-1.png

Slide-1.png

2000 ms

Slide-2.png

Slide-2.png

7551 ms

Slide-3.png

Slide-3.png

3504 ms

Slide-4.png

Slide-4.png

2857 ms

Slide-5.png

Slide-5.png

6423 ms

Slide-6.png

Slide-6.png

3090 ms

Slide-71.png

Slide-71.png

4148 ms

callus.png

callus.png

3550 ms

newsletter-icon.png

newsletter-icon.png

3776 ms

module_icons.png

module_icons.png

3798 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

68 ms

totop_scroller.png

totop_scroller.png

3995 ms

admin-ajax.php

admin-ajax.php

4215 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

12 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

73 ms

overlay.png

overlay.png

4205 ms

controls.png

controls.png

4281 ms

border.png

border.png

4432 ms

loading_background.png

loading_background.png

4476 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

4952 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

37 ms

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

31 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

134 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

125 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

123 ms

widget_v2.135.js

widget_v2.135.js

19 ms

__$$__stringtable_lang_zh_TW.js

__$$__stringtable_lang_zh_TW.js

15 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

19 ms

avatar_simple_visitor.png

avatar_simple_visitor.png

66 ms

aL63HcygAAVYuCCsAAA==

aL63HcygAAVYuCCsAAA==

1 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

262 ms

Accessibility Review

acceptediting.tw accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

acceptediting.tw best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

acceptediting.tw SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Acceptediting.tw can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Acceptediting.tw main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

acceptediting.tw

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Acceptediting. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: