4.5 sec in total
142 ms
3.9 sec
464 ms
Click here to check amazing Acecomp content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about acecomp.in
Same Day Support SLA with Over 12 Years of Experience. Best in Class Computer AMC Services Delhi, Noida & NCR. Assured 30% Saving in IT Spendings.
Visit acecomp.inWe analyzed Acecomp.in page load time and found that the first response time was 142 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
acecomp.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value9.9 s
0/100
25%
Value10.7 s
7/100
10%
Value1,950 ms
8/100
30%
Value1.12
1/100
15%
Value10.4 s
24/100
10%
142 ms
1208 ms
77 ms
113 ms
93 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Acecomp.in, 71% (55 requests) were made to Acecomp.co.in and 13% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Acecomp.co.in.
Page size can be reduced by 103.0 kB (17%)
609.1 kB
506.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Acecomp.in main page is 609.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 230.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 87.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Acecomp images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 216 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Acecomp.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (68%)
60
19
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Acecomp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
acecomp.in
142 ms
acecomp.co.in
1208 ms
webfont.js
77 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
113 ms
style.css
93 ms
styles.css
137 ms
settings.css
133 ms
bootstrap.min.css
139 ms
font-awesome.min.css
155 ms
infopress-css.css
156 ms
owl.carousel.css
163 ms
slicknav.css
162 ms
style.css
183 ms
infopress-responsive.css
225 ms
js_composer.min.css
192 ms
jquery.min.js
191 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
182 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
190 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
259 ms
modernizr-2.6.2-respond-1.1.0.min.js
258 ms
email-decode.min.js
257 ms
font-awesome.css
671 ms
index.js
255 ms
index.js
254 ms
info-twitter.js
364 ms
bootstrap.min.js
367 ms
superfish.pack.1.4.1.js
256 ms
theia-sticky-sidebar.js
365 ms
player_api
253 ms
froogaloop2.min.js
174 ms
infopress-scripts.js
364 ms
owl.carousel.js
524 ms
js
254 ms
map.js
528 ms
comment-reply.min.js
528 ms
infopress-main.js
529 ms
api.js
250 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
528 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
530 ms
index.js
530 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
551 ms
css
248 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
304 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
578 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
580 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
611 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
607 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexQ.ttf
610 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf
605 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf
604 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf
609 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWVAexQ.ttf
608 ms
main-logo.png
419 ms
dummy.png
1319 ms
tirun.jpg
419 ms
trans.jpg
1307 ms
eka.jpg
161 ms
journeymart.jpg
418 ms
stimulus.png
420 ms
sacreddot.jpg
870 ms
53-512-60x60.png
489 ms
footer-greyscale.png
488 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
471 ms
Nexa-Bold-webfont.woff
421 ms
Nexa-Light-webfont.woff
692 ms
map.png
94 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
404 ms
www-widgetapi.js
199 ms
gen_204
138 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
642 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
53 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
409 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
395 ms
revolution.extension.parallax.min.js
380 ms
common.js
23 ms
util.js
23 ms
map.js
18 ms
marker.js
12 ms
acecomp.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
acecomp.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
acecomp.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Acecomp.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Acecomp.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
acecomp.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Acecomp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: