5.9 sec in total
424 ms
5.2 sec
268 ms
Visit aceweb.com now to see the best up-to-date Ace Web content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about aceweb.com
Visit aceweb.com
We analyzed Aceweb.com page load time and found that the first response time was 424 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
aceweb.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.0 s
4/100
10%
Value7.6 s
3/100
25%
Value12.0 s
4/100
10%
Value1,430 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.142
78/100
15%
Value19.4 s
2/100
10%
424 ms
310 ms
355 ms
151 ms
151 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Aceweb.com, 12% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Aceweb.com.
Page size can be reduced by 3.4 MB (80%)
4.3 MB
878.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Aceweb.com main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.7 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ace Web needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.7 MB or 86% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 273.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 273.8 kB or 44% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 445.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Aceweb.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 445.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (78%)
80
18
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ace Web. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
aceweb.com
424 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
310 ms
style.min.css
355 ms
style.css
151 ms
styles.css
151 ms
uikit.css
297 ms
font-awesome.css
208 ms
linea-icon.css
188 ms
small-icon.css
305 ms
accordion.css
221 ms
datepicker.css
254 ms
dotnav.css
277 ms
form-advanced.css
304 ms
slidenav.css
318 ms
slider.css
343 ms
slideshow.css
361 ms
sticky.css
365 ms
tooltip.css
368 ms
shortcodes.css
1136 ms
widgets.css
408 ms
responsive.css
417 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
428 ms
woocommerce.css
506 ms
pagenavi-css.css
435 ms
css
41 ms
grid.css
485 ms
slideshow.css
500 ms
mediaelement.css
517 ms
woocommerce-theme.css
510 ms
style.css
553 ms
responsive.css
636 ms
style-custom.css
570 ms
jquery.js
849 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
560 ms
uikit.min.js
1219 ms
sticky.js
541 ms
grid.js
563 ms
api.js
34 ms
login.js
603 ms
scripts.js
566 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
582 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
594 ms
js.cookie.min.js
572 ms
woocommerce.min.js
577 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
594 ms
comment-reply.min.js
574 ms
lightbox.js
564 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
676 ms
portfolio.config.js
612 ms
tooltip.js
624 ms
slideshow.js
636 ms
slideshow-fx.js
642 ms
mediaelement.js
1505 ms
cart.js
660 ms
theme-functions.js
683 ms
wp-embed.min.js
684 ms
parallax.js
679 ms
style.css
629 ms
aceweb_logo.png
156 ms
12767085-2912x4368.jpg
1701 ms
voip.png
3569 ms
sld2.jpg
204 ms
sld_object2.png
403 ms
sld3.jpg
231 ms
WidgetScript
99 ms
analytics.js
112 ms
server.svg
239 ms
browser.svg
242 ms
graph.svg
360 ms
processor.svg
362 ms
cashbox.svg
369 ms
bg_footer.png
374 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf
112 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf
134 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf
185 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf
167 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf
184 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf
184 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w-.ttf
183 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-.ttf
182 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf
187 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-.ttf
186 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
518 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
564 ms
collect
76 ms
js
80 ms
recaptcha__en.js
111 ms
refill
99 ms
aceweb.com
196 ms
ajax-loader.gif
85 ms
fallback
23 ms
fallback__ltr.css
5 ms
css
17 ms
logo_48.png
4 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
8 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
4 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
68 ms
aceweb.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
aceweb.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
aceweb.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aceweb.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Aceweb.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
aceweb.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ace Web. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: