3.4 sec in total
404 ms
2.7 sec
346 ms
Click here to check amazing Acro Web content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about acroweb.mx
Obtenga el mejor programador web y diseño de paginas web de todo tipo desde informativas hasta enormes webs con más de 10 millones de visitas.
Visit acroweb.mxWe analyzed Acroweb.mx page load time and found that the first response time was 404 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
acroweb.mx performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
82/100
10%
Value5.9 s
14/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value6,080 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.008
100/100
15%
Value9.6 s
29/100
10%
404 ms
189 ms
69 ms
150 ms
196 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Acroweb.mx, 7% (6 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Acroweb.mx.
Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (55%)
3.3 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Acroweb.mx main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 138.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 138.4 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Acro Web images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 600.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Acroweb.mx needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 600.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (73%)
86
23
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Acro Web. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
acroweb.mx
404 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
189 ms
css
69 ms
cuteslider.css
150 ms
Defaults.css
196 ms
lbd_layout.css
151 ms
styles.css
194 ms
settings.css
278 ms
bootstrap.min.css
434 ms
style.css
269 ms
template.css
597 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
370 ms
zn_dynamic.css
414 ms
titan-framework-screets-cx-css.css
386 ms
css
78 ms
scx.icons.css
401 ms
scx.basic.css
780 ms
swatchbook.css
465 ms
custom.css
522 ms
zn_pb_css.css
537 ms
default.css
552 ms
basic.css
695 ms
blackwhite.css
637 ms
jquery-2.1.4.min.js
868 ms
cute.slider.js
798 ms
cute.transitions.all.js
813 ms
respond.min.js
44 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
752 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
980 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1002 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1002 ms
modernizr.js
1010 ms
modernizr.custom.js
1009 ms
jquery.swatchbook.js
1001 ms
addthis_widget.js
69 ms
lbd_scripts.js
1136 ms
output.css
1138 ms
hoverIntent.js
1146 ms
ubermenu.min.js
1136 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1199 ms
twemoji.min.js
45 ms
scripts.js
1168 ms
plugins.js
1230 ms
znscript.js
1224 ms
scx.polyfill.js
1062 ms
firebase.min.js
1232 ms
scx.firebase.js
1179 ms
scx.app.js
1063 ms
scx.frontend.ui.js
1179 ms
jquery.simplemodal.js
1081 ms
default.js
1102 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1089 ms
intero.png
86 ms
logo-2.png
395 ms
paginas-web.jpg
665 ms
video-pattern-1.png
534 ms
creative-web-page-design-2-650x433-650x433.jpg
601 ms
iStock_000020494282_ExtraSmall-425x282.jpg
606 ms
paginas-hosting-1-360x240.jpg
600 ms
icono11.png
588 ms
icono2.png
664 ms
s.png
732 ms
ico-launch.png
732 ms
Macbook.png
753 ms
analitycs.png
758 ms
index.php
1214 ms
lbd_small_reload_icon.gif
776 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
73 ms
4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf
91 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
113 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
890 ms
kl-social-icons.woff
890 ms
atrk.js
79 ms
analytics.js
64 ms
collect
17 ms
atrk.gif
32 ms
300lo.json
150 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
69 ms
all.js&version=v2.0
145 ms
widgets.js
119 ms
counter.5524cceca805eb4b9b2b.js
83 ms
lbd_small_disabled_reload_icon.gif
334 ms
pinit00.png
75 ms
shares.json
150 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
35 ms
120 ms
xd_arbiter.php
44 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.es.html
14 ms
jot
110 ms
jot
65 ms
layers.e5ea973510bf60b3db41.js
28 ms
es.js
6 ms
acroweb.mx accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
acroweb.mx best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
acroweb.mx SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Acroweb.mx can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Acroweb.mx main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
acroweb.mx
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Acro Web. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: