27.2 sec in total
3.3 sec
23.3 sec
600 ms
Welcome to ad.plus homepage info - get ready to check Ad best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about ad.plus
Make money from premium direct video and display advertising by Ad+. AdPlus offers the highest CPM ad network for publishers Ad Plus
Visit ad.plusWe analyzed Ad.plus page load time and found that the first response time was 3.3 sec and then it took 23.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
ad.plus performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value46.8 s
0/100
25%
Value0
0/100
10%
Value560 ms
53/100
30%
Value0.037
100/100
15%
Value62.9 s
0/100
10%
3263 ms
20 ms
228 ms
126 ms
51 ms
Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (101 requests) were addressed to the original Ad.plus, 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Translate.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (18.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Ad.plus.
Page size can be reduced by 252.1 kB (23%)
1.1 MB
844.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Ad.plus main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 784.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 206.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ad needs image optimization as it can save up to 206.9 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 10.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ad.plus has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (60%)
105
42
The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ad. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ad.plus
3263 ms
Q-ItFLrjIZkD4fN8oR4PymuMS2s.js
20 ms
style.css
228 ms
responsive.css
126 ms
gtm.js
51 ms
8LJycz8wvp69Q2ekXrP18rqPZZ4.js
18 ms
Ad+.png
29 ms
dashboard1.png
274 ms
dashboard2.png
175 ms
shape-8.svg
177 ms
shape-9.svg
176 ms
shape-10.svg
222 ms
shape-11.svg
231 ms
gcpplogo1.png
380 ms
newsweek.png
239 ms
msn.png
301 ms
marca.png
318 ms
dailymotion.png
330 ms
elle.png
340 ms
westernjournal.com.png
372 ms
venturebeat.png
406 ms
independent.co.uk.png
432 ms
metro.png
445 ms
heavy.com.png
447 ms
inquirer.png
738 ms
glam.png
496 ms
dailyhive.png
519 ms
india.png
539 ms
glacier.png
1563 ms
donga.png
564 ms
elmundo.png
606 ms
elbalad.png
1607 ms
odyssey.png
1639 ms
mk.png
671 ms
gulf.png
731 ms
bt.png
760 ms
bg-shape1.svg
821 ms
icon23.svg
832 ms
shape-18.svg
841 ms
shape-20.svg
903 ms
element.js
49 ms
email-decode.min.js
808 ms
js
36 ms
3111404.js
94 ms
jquery.2.2.3.min.js
1009 ms
popper.min.js
860 ms
bootstrap.min.js
2002 ms
conversations-embed.js
47 ms
collectedforms.js
59 ms
3111404.js
78 ms
banner.js
99 ms
custom.js
948 ms
css
45 ms
circular-std.css
1001 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1085 ms
menu.css
1081 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1191 ms
owl.carousel.css
1154 ms
owl.theme.css
1240 ms
animate.css
1218 ms
aos.css
1313 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
1308 ms
snazzy-info-window.min.css
1291 ms
flaticon.css
1340 ms
custom-animation.css
1334 ms
style.css
1317 ms
iziModal.css
1462 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
1377 ms
selectize.css
1342 ms
tabs.css
1332 ms
aos.js
1312 ms
wow.min.js
1406 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1363 ms
jquery.appear.js
1299 ms
jquery.countTo.js
1238 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
1330 ms
lang.js
1281 ms
theme.js
1232 ms
shape-21.svg
1224 ms
shape-22.svg
1230 ms
shape-19.svg
1310 ms
bg-shape2.svg
1235 ms
icon24.svg
1137 ms
shape-15.svg
1160 ms
shape-16.svg
1126 ms
display-carousel.gif
2157 ms
screen2.gif
995 ms
screen4.gif
996 ms
bg-shape3.svg
860 ms
icon25.svg
863 ms
shape-17.svg
835 ms
screen555.gif
1931 ms
screen66.gif
18460 ms
shape-26.svg
817 ms
shape-29.svg
786 ms
shape-30.svg
1835 ms
icon29.svg
963 ms
shape-67.svg
869 ms
adplus-advertising.png
1920 ms
shape-12.svg
797 ms
shape-13.svg
904 ms
shape-14.svg
1999 ms
bg3.png
1536 ms
shape-28.svg
1627 ms
map2.png
1656 ms
CircularStd-Book.woff
1637 ms
CircularStd-Medium.woff
1790 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1849 ms
Flaticon.svg
1806 ms
Flaticon.woff
1771 ms
ad.plus accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ad.plus best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
ad.plus SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ad.plus can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ad.plus main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ad.plus
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ad. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: