4.3 sec in total
1.3 sec
2.8 sec
236 ms
Click here to check amazing Adblaze content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about adblaze.com
Visit adblaze.comWe analyzed Adblaze.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
adblaze.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value8.6 s
17/100
10%
Value320 ms
76/100
30%
Value0.765
5/100
15%
Value11.3 s
19/100
10%
1305 ms
53 ms
68 ms
55 ms
59 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Adblaze.com, 37% (29 requests) were made to Buylikes.co and 13% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Adblaze.com.
Page size can be reduced by 815.1 kB (69%)
1.2 MB
361.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Adblaze.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 583.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 271.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 271.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Adblaze images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 411.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 411.2 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 132.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Adblaze.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 132.6 kB or 70% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (84%)
37
6
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Adblaze. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
adblaze.com
1305 ms
divi.css
53 ms
dashicons.min.css
68 ms
extra.min.css
55 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
59 ms
woocommerce.css
69 ms
common.min.css
57 ms
photoswipe.min.css
17 ms
default-skin.min.css
29 ms
select2.min.css
43 ms
jquery.min.js
54 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
31 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
36 ms
js.cookie.min.js
39 ms
woocommerce.min.js
40 ms
jquery.zoom.min.js
46 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
52 ms
photoswipe.min.js
66 ms
photoswipe-ui-default.min.js
66 ms
single-product.min.js
67 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
66 ms
country-select.min.js
66 ms
address-i18n.min.js
18 ms
checkout.min.js
33 ms
selectWoo.full.min.js
70 ms
et-core-unified-15.min.css
18 ms
Logo.png
332 ms
Screenshot_17.jpg
66 ms
Screenshot_18.jpg
67 ms
Screenshot_19.jpg
67 ms
instagram-logo-e1620081245524.png
328 ms
tiktok-logo-e1620081414252.png
327 ms
joomla-logo.jpg
328 ms
wordpress-themes-logo.jpg
328 ms
html-logo.jpg
328 ms
shopify-logo.jpg
328 ms
magento-logo.jpg
328 ms
opencart-logo.jpg
327 ms
990e45c3e7e6415082297422dbff7183.jpg
327 ms
tf.jpg
327 ms
ts.jpg
328 ms
wpai.jpg
328 ms
gv.jpg
328 ms
acf.jpg
327 ms
dnc.jpg
327 ms
ith.jpg
327 ms
cc.jpg
327 ms
yi.jpg
327 ms
db.jpg
327 ms
dm.jpg
326 ms
wjm.jpg
327 ms
button-presets.css
22 ms
common.min.js
23 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff
28 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
57 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff
74 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
83 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff
83 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
82 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff
84 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
85 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQ.woff
84 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
105 ms
wARDj0u
12 ms
modules.woff
54 ms
bb.jpg
259 ms
edd.jpg
258 ms
gf.jpg
258 ms
y.jpg
258 ms
et.jpg
258 ms
tt.jpg
258 ms
wpdev.jpg
258 ms
et-divi-dynamic-tb-38-tb-113-15-late.css
22 ms
scripts.min.js
93 ms
common.js
29 ms
select2.full.min.js
28 ms
frontend-script.js
57 ms
adblaze.com
519 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
18 ms
adblaze.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
adblaze.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
adblaze.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Adblaze.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Adblaze.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
adblaze.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Adblaze. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: