3.1 sec in total
44 ms
2.9 sec
199 ms
Click here to check amazing Adbrands content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about adbrands.net
The latest data and insights on modern agency ecosystems, agency performance, and marketing agency partnerships.
Visit adbrands.netWe analyzed Adbrands.net page load time and found that the first response time was 44 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
adbrands.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value13.9 s
0/100
25%
Value7.7 s
24/100
10%
Value1,450 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.057
98/100
15%
Value11.9 s
17/100
10%
44 ms
366 ms
201 ms
39 ms
41 ms
Our browser made a total of 112 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (99 requests) were addressed to the original Adbrands.net, 8% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Adbrands.net.
Page size can be reduced by 249.0 kB (16%)
1.5 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Adbrands.net main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 235.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 235.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Adbrands images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 17 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 91 (90%)
101
10
The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Adbrands. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 67 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
adbrands.net
44 ms
adbrands.net
366 ms
index.css
201 ms
main.min.css
39 ms
css
41 ms
wc-memberships-blocks.min.css
209 ms
woocommerce-layout-grid.min.css
52 ms
woocommerce-grid.min.css
253 ms
wc-memberships-frontend.min.css
241 ms
style.css
221 ms
astra-addon-65b2833f019314-11141507.css
395 ms
frontend.min.css
515 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
431 ms
swiper.min.css
390 ms
post-932.css
411 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
453 ms
uael-frontend.min.css
642 ms
all.min.css
652 ms
v4-shims.min.css
601 ms
style.css
600 ms
post-5.css
624 ms
style.css
685 ms
css
44 ms
jquery.min.js
832 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
775 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
630 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
639 ms
js.cookie.min.js
647 ms
woocommerce.min.js
651 ms
grid.js
822 ms
custom.js
820 ms
v4-shims.min.js
848 ms
js
65 ms
widget-animated-headline.min.css
907 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
995 ms
embed.js
55 ms
email-decode.min.js
821 ms
wc-blocks.css
1009 ms
footer.css
1008 ms
frontend.min.js
903 ms
selectWoo.full.min.js
876 ms
wc-memberships-blocks-common.min.js
1047 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
869 ms
order-attribution.min.js
729 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
715 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
754 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
735 ms
react.min.js
778 ms
hooks.min.js
780 ms
deprecated.min.js
793 ms
dom.min.js
621 ms
react-dom.min.js
642 ms
escape-html.min.js
634 ms
element.min.js
625 ms
is-shallow-equal.min.js
530 ms
i18n.min.js
637 ms
keycodes.min.js
506 ms
priority-queue.min.js
500 ms
compose.min.js
492 ms
private-apis.min.js
483 ms
redux-routine.min.js
480 ms
data.min.js
481 ms
lodash.min.js
482 ms
wc-blocks-registry.js
594 ms
url.min.js
359 ms
api-fetch.min.js
314 ms
wc-settings.js
476 ms
data-controls.min.js
317 ms
html-entities.min.js
310 ms
notices.min.js
252 ms
wc-blocks-middleware.js
435 ms
wc-blocks-data.js
456 ms
dom-ready.min.js
468 ms
a11y.min.js
495 ms
primitives.min.js
382 ms
warning.min.js
335 ms
blocks-components.js
572 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
55 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff
55 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff
91 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEw.woff
112 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtG.woff
114 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
113 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff
113 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEw.woff
115 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEw.woff
114 ms
blocks-checkout.js
564 ms
order-attribution-blocks.min.js
355 ms
astra-addon-65b2833f01c324-07220968.js
417 ms
jquery-numerator.min.js
417 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
531 ms
slick.min.js
555 ms
isotope.min.js
523 ms
uael-posts.min.js
517 ms
jquery_resize.min.js
631 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
630 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
621 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
622 ms
frontend.min.js
654 ms
waypoints.min.js
644 ms
core.min.js
760 ms
frontend.min.js
835 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
789 ms
Adbrands-Logo-for-180x-60.svg
787 ms
logo-mobile-50x50.png
648 ms
r3-logo-white.png
654 ms
logo-white.png
827 ms
Wordpress-Blog-Post-Size-Adbrands.png
918 ms
Wordpress-Blog-Post-Size-Adbrands-4.png
1122 ms
Wordpress-Blog-Post-Size-Adbrands-1.png
935 ms
Wordpress-Blog-Post-Size-Adbrands-2.png
1162 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen-grid.min.css
173 ms
adbrands.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
adbrands.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
adbrands.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Adbrands.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Adbrands.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
adbrands.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Adbrands. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: