1.9 sec in total
191 ms
1.3 sec
427 ms
Click here to check amazing Admark content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about admark.net
Admark is a full service agency specialized in social media marketing services, graphics design, printing, web design and development company with office in Riyadh Olaya Saudi Arabia.
Visit admark.netWe analyzed Admark.net page load time and found that the first response time was 191 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
admark.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
84/100
10%
Value3.0 s
78/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.239
52/100
15%
Value3.8 s
90/100
10%
191 ms
222 ms
236 ms
238 ms
239 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Admark.net, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (513 ms) belongs to the original domain Admark.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (56%)
2.4 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Admark.net main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 84.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 36.0 kB, which is 38% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.8 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Admark needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 59% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 10.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Admark.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.2 kB or 18% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (26%)
68
50
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Admark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
admark.net
191 ms
fonts.css
222 ms
crumina-fonts.css
236 ms
normalize.css
238 ms
grid.css
239 ms
styles.css
296 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css
241 ms
swiper.min.css
273 ms
primary-menu.css
287 ms
magnific-popup.css
290 ms
css
35 ms
jquery-2.1.4.min.js
380 ms
crum-mega-menu.js
290 ms
swiper.jquery.min.js
410 ms
theme-plugins.js
413 ms
main.js
379 ms
form-actions.js
378 ms
velocity.min.js
389 ms
ScrollMagic.min.js
411 ms
animation.velocity.min.js
426 ms
ga.js
72 ms
logo.png
196 ms
sa.png
197 ms
contact4.png
200 ms
contact5.png
201 ms
contact6.png
201 ms
slider1.png
384 ms
slider3.png
253 ms
slider5.png
200 ms
slider2.png
354 ms
slider4.png
356 ms
Digital-Marketing-100x100.png
302 ms
Social-Media-Marketing-100x100.png
253 ms
Content-Driven-Digital-Marketing-100x100.png
304 ms
Search-Engine-Optimization-100x100.png
304 ms
Search-Engine-Marketing-100x100.png
357 ms
Digital-Advertising-100x100.png
361 ms
Viral-Marketing-100x100.png
360 ms
Web-Design-and-Development-100x100.png
406 ms
Digital-Publishing-100x100.png
408 ms
Marketing-Consultancy-100x100.png
409 ms
Graphics-Printing-100x100.png
410 ms
Google-Services-100x100.png
410 ms
9abaya.jpg
487 ms
techmark.jpg
458 ms
walanyt.jpg
510 ms
avatar-bg.png
461 ms
avatar.png
462 ms
testimonial1.png
420 ms
testimonial2.png
465 ms
baabrisk.png
456 ms
backcomfort.png
457 ms
w8gdH283Tvk__Lua32TysjIfp8uK.ttf
143 ms
seosight.ttf
457 ms
__utm.gif
136 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
513 ms
ballorat.png
470 ms
communication_and_information_technology_commission.png
374 ms
hyundai.png
375 ms
kmc.png
376 ms
mando.png
375 ms
sehai.png
420 ms
wallan.png
420 ms
ziebart.png
420 ms
riyadh-chamber.png
474 ms
ministry-of-health.png
424 ms
kin-khalid-foundation.png
496 ms
al-muallim.png
421 ms
circle-facebook.svg
369 ms
twitter.svg
370 ms
youtube.svg
371 ms
linkedin.svg
373 ms
admark.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
admark.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
admark.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Admark.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Admark.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
admark.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Admark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: