3.6 sec in total
237 ms
2.8 sec
516 ms
Click here to check amazing Aesthetique content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about aesthetique.com
Plastic Surgeon Southbury, CT - Aesthetique Cosmetic Laser Center, Dr. Prasad Sureddi located in Waterbury, Southbury, CT near the Hartford, Bridgeport, New Haven, CT and New York Area. Specializing i...
Visit aesthetique.comWe analyzed Aesthetique.com page load time and found that the first response time was 237 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
aesthetique.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value18.6 s
0/100
25%
Value11.6 s
5/100
10%
Value1,900 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value19.0 s
3/100
10%
237 ms
239 ms
351 ms
15 ms
33 ms
Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Aesthetique.com, 8% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Pumc.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (546 ms) belongs to the original domain Aesthetique.com.
Page size can be reduced by 172.5 kB (15%)
1.2 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Aesthetique.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 627.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 151.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 151.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Aesthetique images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 6.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 15.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Aesthetique.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 74 (81%)
91
17
The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Aesthetique. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
aesthetique.com
237 ms
www.aesthetique.com
239 ms
www.aesthetique.com
351 ms
style.min.css
15 ms
style.css
33 ms
style.css
361 ms
style.css
37 ms
style.css
28 ms
style.css
33 ms
style.css
45 ms
page-list.css
53 ms
widget-options.css
52 ms
pagenavi-css.css
53 ms
style.css
55 ms
style.css
63 ms
css
53 ms
stylesheet.css
58 ms
style.css
64 ms
ubermenu.min.css
66 ms
minimal.css
382 ms
fontawesome.min.css
70 ms
fa-solid.min.css
74 ms
all.min.css
76 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
80 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
81 ms
frontend.min.css
87 ms
lightbox.min.css
89 ms
custom.css
92 ms
frontend.min.css
96 ms
jquery.min.js
102 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
110 ms
rbtools.min.js
486 ms
rs6.min.js
109 ms
easy-testimonials-reveal.js
115 ms
css
45 ms
formreset.min.css
119 ms
formsmain.min.css
126 ms
readyclass.min.css
125 ms
browsers.min.css
130 ms
rs6.css
141 ms
api.js
46 ms
navigation.js
140 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
133 ms
theme-features.js
135 ms
ubermenu.min.js
131 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
131 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
159 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
546 ms
muuri.min.js
128 ms
lc-micro-slider.min.js
139 ms
lc-lazyload.min.js
152 ms
mediagrid.min.js
153 ms
jquery.hoverdir.min.js
158 ms
lc_text_shortener.min.js
162 ms
overlays.min.js
165 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
171 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
169 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
177 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
176 ms
dom-ready.min.js
181 ms
hooks.min.js
184 ms
i18n.min.js
189 ms
a11y.min.js
186 ms
jquery.json.min.js
192 ms
gravityforms.min.js
192 ms
conditional_logic.min.js
201 ms
jquery.textareaCounter.plugin.min.js
194 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
206 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
203 ms
utils.min.js
208 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
204 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
219 ms
gtm.js
194 ms
logo.png
135 ms
gmb-sprite.png
507 ms
dummy.png
506 ms
icon-testimonials.png
136 ms
icon-gallery.png
135 ms
icon-specials.png
177 ms
southbury-map-sm.jpg
178 ms
waterbury-map-sm.jpg
178 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_GbQbMZhKg.ttf
89 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjQbMZhKg.ttf
88 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_N_XbMZhKg.ttf
130 ms
8vIU7ww63mVu7gtR-kwKxNvkNOjw-tbnfY3lCA.ttf
131 ms
Qw3JZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5EUCGZ2dIn0FyA96fCT6oJRLSzt.ttf
132 ms
Qw3JZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5EUCGZ2dIn0FyA96fCTtIJRLSzt.ttf
272 ms
icomoon.ttf
472 ms
422929393
432 ms
leaf-sm.png
185 ms
map.jpg
186 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
36 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
36 ms
js
188 ms
analytics.js
184 ms
app.js
312 ms
recaptcha__en.js
136 ms
939947032-dc4f3d21fdf3867bb469b38a6bfb47b063c68d31816fbd46165c0fb3d2efba6c-d
155 ms
birdeye.php
466 ms
collect
60 ms
font-awesome.min.css
294 ms
birdeye.css
22 ms
star-rating-sprite.png
300 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
14 ms
aesthetique.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
aesthetique.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
aesthetique.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aesthetique.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Aesthetique.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
aesthetique.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Aesthetique. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: