12.3 sec in total
3.3 sec
8.5 sec
575 ms
Click here to check amazing Afill content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about afill.com
Join our end-to-end affiliate platform, build lucrative partnerships and drive sales. We specialise in finance, property, software & services sectors.
Visit afill.comWe analyzed Afill.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.3 sec and then it took 9.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
afill.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
10/100
10%
Value5.6 s
17/100
25%
Value13.5 s
2/100
10%
Value640 ms
46/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value12.2 s
15/100
10%
3270 ms
247 ms
493 ms
726 ms
729 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Afill.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Afill.com.
Page size can be reduced by 182.9 kB (9%)
2.1 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Afill.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 178.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 178.5 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Afill images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Afill.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (56%)
73
32
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Afill. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
afill.com
3270 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
247 ms
style.min.css
493 ms
theme.min.css
726 ms
all.min.css
729 ms
v4-shims.min.css
737 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
743 ms
jquery.magnificpopup.min.css
755 ms
33-layout.css
1016 ms
cdd0900c2fb36bfe700e871fe350d229-layout-bundle.css
967 ms
bootstrap.min.css
975 ms
skin-5d11ff7fb9b24.css
981 ms
style.css
990 ms
css
56 ms
jquery.js
1259 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1208 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1218 ms
api.js
57 ms
css
53 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
1219 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
1233 ms
jquery.fitvids.min.js
1389 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
1457 ms
jquery.magnificpopup.min.js
1459 ms
masonry.min.js
1501 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
1504 ms
jquery-masonary.js
1508 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1517 ms
js
92 ms
33-layout.js
1690 ms
jquery.ba-throttle-debounce.min.js
1749 ms
e435d3260669243bd0b924f957b184c8-layout-bundle.js
1750 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1750 ms
theme.min.js
1761 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1770 ms
api.js
72 ms
js
81 ms
Afill-white.png
623 ms
Afill-Gradient-Logo.png
631 ms
BG-Blue1.png
1372 ms
Com.png
911 ms
Rectangle-1154.png
702 ms
2.png
714 ms
3.png
864 ms
funnel-1.png
873 ms
Rectangle-1154-copy-4.png
955 ms
Rectangle-1154-copy-3.png
967 ms
Rectangle-1154-copy-2.png
1106 ms
Rectangle-1154-copy.png
1116 ms
Advertisers2.png
1159 ms
Yopaa.png
1708 ms
zencargo.jpg
1221 ms
currencytransfer.jpg
1349 ms
MoneyPlatform.jpg
1359 ms
go2group.png
1656 ms
123td.png
1729 ms
iuir.png
1831 ms
dfefe.png
1845 ms
s1.png
1616 ms
s2.png
1787 ms
font
37 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
2078 ms
recaptcha__en.js
44 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1820 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
2051 ms
s3.png
1884 ms
s4.png
1900 ms
s5.png
1911 ms
s6.png
2013 ms
s7.png
1894 ms
s8.png
1899 ms
s9.png
1917 ms
pixel.png
1958 ms
ee.png
2023 ms
font
189 ms
2-1.png
1922 ms
zennn.png
1951 ms
bx_loader.gif
1951 ms
afill.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
afill.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
afill.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Afill.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Afill.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
afill.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Afill. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: