4.9 sec in total
808 ms
3.8 sec
248 ms
Visit afisol.com now to see the best up-to-date Afisol content for Sri Lanka and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about afisol.com
Afisol team is capable of developing new mobile applications or mobile integrations for existing applications. Our team can support with customized IOS / Android ...
Visit afisol.comWe analyzed Afisol.com page load time and found that the first response time was 808 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
afisol.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value12.7 s
3/100
10%
Value1,610 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.13
81/100
15%
Value12.5 s
14/100
10%
808 ms
23 ms
93 ms
161 ms
158 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Afisol.com, 11% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 9% (8 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (808 ms) belongs to the original domain Afisol.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (49%)
2.2 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Afisol.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 328.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Afisol needs image optimization as it can save up to 328.8 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 569.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 569.1 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 113.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Afisol.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 113.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (55%)
82
37
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Afisol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.afisol.com
808 ms
css
23 ms
admin.css
93 ms
prettyPhoto.css
161 ms
wp-video-lightbox.css
158 ms
styles.css
157 ms
lightbox.min.css
155 ms
style.css
143 ms
style.css
231 ms
color-red.css
212 ms
blog.css
234 ms
socialize-bookmarks.css
233 ms
prettyPhoto.css
225 ms
flexslider.css
225 ms
style-stretched.css
281 ms
jquery.js
420 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
314 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
324 ms
video-lightbox.js
336 ms
jquery.slick.contact.1.3.2.js
303 ms
custom.js
351 ms
prettyPhoto.js
372 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
391 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
389 ms
jquery.backstretch.min.js
400 ms
js
57 ms
google_map_plugin.js
470 ms
bra.photostream.js
471 ms
skin.php
520 ms
form.css
472 ms
jquery.form.min.js
499 ms
scripts.js
493 ms
wp-lightbox-2.min.js
489 ms
comment-reply.min.js
552 ms
wp-embed.min.js
552 ms
ga.js
16 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
604 ms
__utm.gif
21 ms
sdk.js
300 ms
logo-min.png
114 ms
sprite.png
113 ms
arrow-chart-3.jpg
296 ms
arrow-chart_with_web.jpg
343 ms
energy_saver.jpg
347 ms
trace.jpg
540 ms
pic1.png
270 ms
pic2.png
270 ms
pic3.png
280 ms
pic4.png
293 ms
bullet-ul.png
345 ms
Afisol-SMS-trading.png
480 ms
EFA-thumb.jpg
355 ms
dn-thumb.jpg
443 ms
asthma-thumb.jpg
551 ms
zuluth.png
488 ms
-g5pDUSRgvxvOl5u-a_WHw.woff
81 ms
HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
82 ms
bH7276GfdCjMjApa_dkG6T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
83 ms
default
327 ms
bg_input.png
339 ms
likebox.php
185 ms
118 ms
xd_arbiter.php
214 ms
xd_arbiter.php
423 ms
icons.png
66 ms
1458506311017
244 ms
ebiMDO3r-8l.css
282 ms
jGc-59L_9lo.css
352 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
489 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
618 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
483 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
504 ms
ajax-loader-3.gif
24 ms
158 ms
39 ms
35 ms
v3
61 ms
203 ms
1908110_718837911561775_2609627693611995845_n.png
427 ms
11659298_718004454978454_3832641687823183344_n.png
493 ms
12790895_912928292160284_1505970931254798086_n.jpg
562 ms
11960273_135806490097734_7638481522969359707_n.jpg
628 ms
1480606_1539031239750837_5689414829528956902_n.jpg
626 ms
1509234_461257020717496_4019326207868117776_n.jpg
630 ms
12795429_833741523414554_1230555344276488842_n.jpg
631 ms
12523024_990759594317811_4421754170265993878_n.jpg
628 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
75 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
75 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
70 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
134 ms
afisol.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
afisol.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
afisol.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Afisol.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Afisol.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
afisol.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Afisol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: