Tools & Wizards About Us
agenda-screening.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

agenda-screening.co.uk

Agenda Screening | Screening Services | Background Screening

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

263 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

912 ms

agenda-screening.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit agenda-screening.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Agenda Screening content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about agenda-screening.co.uk

Need confidence in your decision? Get accurate background screening for employment. Agenda Screening - The UK’s market leader in Screening Services.

Visit agenda-screening.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Agenda-screening.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 263 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

agenda-screening.co.uk performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value11.9 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value27.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value28,780 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.068

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value49.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

agenda-screening.co.uk

263 ms

agenda-screening.co.uk

639 ms

uc.js

56 ms

js

139 ms

yfm7tis.css

191 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Agenda-screening.co.uk, 6% (3 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 4% (2 requests) were made to Consent.cookiebot.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Agenda-screening.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.4 MB (45%)

Content Size

7.6 MB

After Optimization

4.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Agenda-screening.co.uk main page is 7.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 46.1 kB

  • Original 59.3 kB
  • After minification 53.9 kB
  • After compression 13.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 2.4 MB

  • Original 6.4 MB
  • After minification 4.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Agenda Screening needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.4 MB or 37% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 86.9 kB

  • Original 112.1 kB
  • After minification 112.1 kB
  • After compression 25.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 86.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 898.0 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 145.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Agenda-screening.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 898.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (71%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Agenda Screening. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

agenda-screening.co.uk

agenda-screening.co.uk

263 ms

agenda-screening.co.uk

agenda-screening.co.uk

639 ms

uc.js

uc.js

56 ms

js

js

139 ms

yfm7tis.css

yfm7tis.css

191 ms

aos.js

aos.js

377 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

616 ms

bootstrap-icons.css

bootstrap-icons.css

465 ms

boxicons.min.css

boxicons.min.css

456 ms

glightbox.min.css

glightbox.min.css

296 ms

remixicon.css

remixicon.css

375 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

385 ms

style.css

style.css

539 ms

aos.css

aos.css

451 ms

configuration.js

configuration.js

741 ms

cc.js

cc.js

148 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

544 ms

style.css

style.css

451 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

558 ms

wc-blocks-vendors-style.css

wc-blocks-vendors-style.css

557 ms

wc-blocks-style.css

wc-blocks-style.css

773 ms

styles.css

styles.css

579 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

woocommerce-layout.css

606 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

667 ms

style.css

style.css

581 ms

style.css

style.css

582 ms

style.css

style.css

581 ms

logo.png

logo.png

647 ms

quality.svg

quality.svg

647 ms

trusted.svg

trusted.svg

643 ms

candidate-focused.svg

candidate-focused.svg

645 ms

Chat.svg

Chat.svg

715 ms

Phone.svg

Phone.svg

716 ms

Pointer.svg

Pointer.svg

744 ms

Reminder.svg

Reminder.svg

748 ms

Library.svg

Library.svg

746 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

794 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

795 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

916 ms

UKAS-ISO27001-Mark-cl-27_CMYK_With-ISOs2-e1653917128967.jpg

UKAS-ISO27001-Mark-cl-27_CMYK_With-ISOs2-e1653917128967.jpg

796 ms

p.css

p.css

59 ms

bc-v4.min.html

bc-v4.min.html

34 ms

dev.css

dev.css

242 ms

main-bg.png

main-bg.png

1617 ms

video-bg-1.png

video-bg-1.png

324 ms

bg-1.png

bg-1.png

1764 ms

d

d

5 ms

d

d

28 ms

remixicon.woff

remixicon.woff

162 ms

boxicons.woff

boxicons.woff

1375 ms

bootstrap-icons.woff

bootstrap-icons.woff

177 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

81 ms

js

js

21 ms

Accessibility Review

agenda-screening.co.uk accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

High

[aria-*] attributes are not valid or misspelled

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

agenda-screening.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

agenda-screening.co.uk SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Agenda-screening.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Agenda-screening.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

agenda-screening.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Agenda Screening. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: