Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

airgraft.com

AIRGRAFT 2 | Better cannabis vaporizer.

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

80 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

2.2 sec

airgraft.com screenshot

About Website

Visit airgraft.com now to see the best up-to-date AIRGRAFT content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about airgraft.com

Airgraft 2 is the best tasting filterless extract vaporizer. Order online through Airgraft XPRESS and get free delivery on all orders $50+.

Visit airgraft.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Airgraft.com page load time and found that the first response time was 80 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

airgraft.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,610 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.8 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

airgraft.com

80 ms

airgraft.com

49 ms

62 ms

gtm.js

119 ms

klaviyo.js

41 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Airgraft.com, 13% (4 requests) were made to Datocms-assets.com and 10% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) relates to the external source Datocms-assets.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 374.3 kB (10%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

3.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Airgraft.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 154.7 kB

  • Original 209.1 kB
  • After minification 209.1 kB
  • After compression 54.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 154.7 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 219.4 kB

  • Original 3.5 MB
  • After minification 3.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. AIRGRAFT images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 150 B

  • Original 71.6 kB
  • After minification 71.6 kB
  • After compression 71.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (71%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of AIRGRAFT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

airgraft.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

airgraft.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

airgraft.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Airgraft.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Airgraft.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of AIRGRAFT. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: