Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

ajjuma.com

This site is under development

Page Load Speed

355 ms in total

First Response

123 ms

Resources Loaded

165 ms

Page Rendered

67 ms

ajjuma.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ajjuma.com now to see the best up-to-date Ajjuma content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ajjuma.com

Visit ajjuma.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ajjuma.com page load time and found that the first response time was 123 ms and then it took 232 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ajjuma.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

ajjuma.com

123 ms

jquery.min.js

12 ms

www.searchvity.com

13 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ajjuma.com, 33% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 33% (1 request) were made to Searchvity.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (123 ms) belongs to the original domain Ajjuma.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 692 B (2%)

Content Size

34.2 kB

After Optimization

33.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Ajjuma.com main page is 34.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 33.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 692 B

  • Original 1.3 kB
  • After minification 1.0 kB
  • After compression 565 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 209 B, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 692 B or 55% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 33.0 kB
  • After minification 33.0 kB
  • After compression 33.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ajjuma. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

ajjuma.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

ajjuma.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ajjuma.com SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ajjuma.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Ajjuma.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ajjuma. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: