3.7 sec in total
145 ms
3.3 sec
250 ms
Welcome to alacrita.com homepage info - get ready to check Alacrita best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about alacrita.com
Expert life science consultants helping biotech and pharma companies advance their programs. 350+ specialists across R&D and business functions.
Visit alacrita.comWe analyzed Alacrita.com page load time and found that the first response time was 145 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
alacrita.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value7.6 s
4/100
25%
Value6.5 s
39/100
10%
Value310 ms
78/100
30%
Value0.225
55/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
145 ms
411 ms
32 ms
70 ms
41 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Alacrita.com, 15% (6 requests) were made to 3828687.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net and 10% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (411 ms) belongs to the original domain Alacrita.com.
Page size can be reduced by 78.5 kB (35%)
226.7 kB
148.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Alacrita.com main page is 226.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 95.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 55.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 68 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Alacrita needs image optimization as it can save up to 68 B or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 8.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 14.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Alacrita.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.1 kB or 22% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (83%)
36
6
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Alacrita. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
alacrita.com
145 ms
www.alacrita.com
411 ms
module_9149058469_Alacrita_April2019_Theme_Custom_Modules_Page_Scroll_-_Alacrita_April2019.min.css
32 ms
js
70 ms
layout.min.css
41 ms
Alacrita_April2019-style.css
50 ms
jquery-1.7.1.js
43 ms
embed.js
35 ms
Alacrita_April2019-main.js
54 ms
project.js
91 ms
project.js
58 ms
jquery.matchHeight.js
67 ms
module_77706337813_Case_Study_Module.min.js
91 ms
v2.js
105 ms
3828687.js
102 ms
index.js
97 ms
js
57 ms
alacrita_logo.svg
124 ms
alacrita_logo_hover.svg
151 ms
alacrita_down_arrow.svg
146 ms
css
42 ms
css
58 ms
css
62 ms
css
61 ms
font-awesome.css
58 ms
animate.css
119 ms
dashicons.css
165 ms
alacrita_ink_sm.webp
233 ms
nav-down-arrow.svg
57 ms
text-header-bg-yellow.svg
94 ms
text-header-bg-white.svg
88 ms
yellow_button_out.svg
91 ms
text-header-bg-white.svg
99 ms
gray-open-quotes.png
57 ms
banner.js
68 ms
3828687.js
104 ms
fb.js
69 ms
web-interactives-embed.js
118 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
25 ms
alacrita.com accessibility score
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
alacrita.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
alacrita.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Alacrita.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Alacrita.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
alacrita.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Alacrita. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: