7.7 sec in total
1.9 sec
5.5 sec
271 ms
Click here to check amazing ALOHAFX content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about alohafx.net
Visit alohafx.netWe analyzed Alohafx.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
alohafx.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.4 s
1/100
10%
Value18.9 s
0/100
25%
Value13.4 s
2/100
10%
Value900 ms
31/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value17.6 s
4/100
10%
1949 ms
151 ms
227 ms
240 ms
245 ms
Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Alohafx.net, 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Alohafx.net.
Page size can be reduced by 212.3 kB (10%)
2.1 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Alohafx.net main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 119.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ALOHAFX images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 11.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 11.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Alohafx.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 82 (87%)
94
12
The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ALOHAFX. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 52 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 32 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
alohafx.net
1949 ms
style.min.css
151 ms
styles.css
227 ms
bootstrap.min.css
240 ms
front.css
245 ms
style-frond_end.css
235 ms
pack_social_follow.css
237 ms
font-awesome.css
308 ms
socicon.css
301 ms
style-front_end.css
315 ms
templates.css
387 ms
animate.css
312 ms
pack_wb.css
319 ms
news-letter-themes-style.css
376 ms
css
43 ms
style.css
384 ms
wpdmpp.css
392 ms
font-awesome-legacy.min.css
397 ms
grid-system.css
393 ms
style.css
460 ms
cf7.css
460 ms
css
65 ms
responsive.css
471 ms
select2.css
473 ms
ascend.css
474 ms
js_composer.min.css
478 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
539 ms
css
58 ms
jquery.min.js
616 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
536 ms
jquery.form.min.js
553 ms
popper.min.js
553 ms
bootstrap.min.js
554 ms
front.js
613 ms
front_end_header.js
614 ms
plusone.js
33 ms
json2.js
656 ms
jstorage.js
657 ms
wpdmpp-front.js
659 ms
analytics-talk-content-tracking.js
688 ms
platform.js
37 ms
optimize.js
57 ms
player.js
27 ms
css
13 ms
style-non-critical.css
675 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
594 ms
core.css
522 ms
fullscreen-legacy.css
513 ms
core.min.js
507 ms
menu.min.js
567 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
563 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
508 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
650 ms
dom-ready.min.js
496 ms
hooks.min.js
489 ms
i18n.min.js
636 ms
a11y.min.js
580 ms
autocomplete.min.js
571 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
566 ms
index.js
591 ms
index.js
631 ms
salient-social.js
632 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js
561 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
564 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
559 ms
priority.js
814 ms
transit.min.js
610 ms
waypoints.js
611 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
556 ms
hoverintent.min.js
542 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
546 ms
anime.min.js
691 ms
superfish.js
691 ms
init.js
703 ms
touchswipe.min.js
631 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
8 ms
select2.min.js
600 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
675 ms
gtm.js
98 ms
sdk.js
96 ms
ALOHAFX_LOGO100px_WP.png
614 ms
EXPORT-CREATE-BARRIL.png
985 ms
EXPORT-CREATE-COVER-SITE-3600_2.png
671 ms
AIT_800-1.png
699 ms
Boxed_800-1.png
651 ms
EXPORT-CREATE-COVER-BG_wide-e1558995209454.png
1280 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
79 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
80 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
197 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
197 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
198 ms
icomoon.woff
614 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
858 ms
sdk.js
133 ms
fbevents.js
92 ms
analytics.js
82 ms
collect
45 ms
1601100860115125
174 ms
collect
36 ms
js
50 ms
ga-audiences
138 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
227 ms
2wftzevmxixty5zom3s3raqsviyd7aeq.js
125 ms
alohafx.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
alohafx.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
alohafx.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Alohafx.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Alohafx.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
alohafx.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ALOHAFX. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: