5.7 sec in total
142 ms
5.2 sec
334 ms
Welcome to alternative-storage.com homepage info - get ready to check Alternative Storage best content right away, or after learning these important things about alternative-storage.com
Visit alternative-storage.comWe analyzed Alternative-storage.com page load time and found that the first response time was 142 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
alternative-storage.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value15.8 s
0/100
25%
Value12.7 s
3/100
10%
Value1,790 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.043
99/100
15%
Value15.7 s
6/100
10%
142 ms
1671 ms
15 ms
62 ms
20 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Alternative-storage.com, 11% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Alternative-storage.com.
Page size can be reduced by 340.5 kB (22%)
1.5 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Alternative-storage.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 726.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 157.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 157.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 377 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Alternative Storage images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 122.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 122.0 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 61.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Alternative-storage.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 61.1 kB or 29% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (81%)
68
13
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Alternative Storage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
alternative-storage.com
142 ms
www.alternative-storage.com
1671 ms
style.min.css
15 ms
css
62 ms
chaty-front.min.css
20 ms
styles.css
34 ms
front-styles.css
33 ms
bootstrap.min.css
34 ms
style.css
41 ms
typography.css
42 ms
custom-frontend-lite.min.css
45 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
41 ms
swiper.min.css
40 ms
style.css
45 ms
theme-elementor.min.css
55 ms
css
81 ms
fontawesome.min.css
50 ms
solid.min.css
48 ms
lqd-essentials.min.css
48 ms
jquery.min.js
48 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
49 ms
lottie.min.js
105 ms
fresco.css
100 ms
lqd-essentials.min.css
100 ms
animations.min.css
77 ms
brands.min.css
100 ms
cht-front-script.min.js
101 ms
index.js
101 ms
index.js
186 ms
blocks.js
188 ms
fastdom.min.js
185 ms
bootstrap.min.js
188 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
194 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
194 ms
fresco.js
205 ms
lity.min.js
193 ms
gsap.min.js
205 ms
CustomEase.min.js
205 ms
DrawSVGPlugin.min.js
222 ms
api.js
291 ms
ScrollTrigger.min.js
223 ms
liquidDrawShape.min.js
216 ms
liquidAnimatedBlob.min.js
272 ms
fontfaceobserver.js
255 ms
intersection-observer.js
252 ms
lazyload.min.js
254 ms
tinycolor-min.js
249 ms
SplitText.min.js
253 ms
theme.min.js
254 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
252 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
247 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
255 ms
index.js
247 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
246 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
263 ms
waypoints.min.js
260 ms
core.min.js
262 ms
frontend.min.js
238 ms
Alternative-Storage_Dark-horizontal-2-05.png
175 ms
Alternative-Storage_Dark-horizontal-04.png
182 ms
bg.svg
172 ms
small-cylinder.png
174 ms
size1.png
174 ms
Line-verde-01.svg
175 ms
price2.png
177 ms
Line-arena-01.svg
178 ms
promoise1.png
174 ms
make-a-payment-1.png
174 ms
logo-mob-tres-01.svg
174 ms
recaptcha__de.js
92 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
125 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf
141 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf
154 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
163 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
165 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
166 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
165 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf
165 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf
165 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
237 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
114 ms
logo-d-1.svg
1644 ms
alternative-storage.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
alternative-storage.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
alternative-storage.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Alternative-storage.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Alternative-storage.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
alternative-storage.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Alternative Storage. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: