3.3 sec in total
320 ms
2.7 sec
230 ms
Welcome to alternative.to homepage info - get ready to check Alternative best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about alternative.to
Alternative search engine - Find best product, place, solution, answer. Compare all alternative to choose best one.
Visit alternative.toWe analyzed Alternative.to page load time and found that the first response time was 320 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
alternative.to performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
66/100
10%
Value5.9 s
15/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value1,430 ms
16/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value13.5 s
11/100
10%
320 ms
696 ms
108 ms
508 ms
144 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 32% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Alternative.to, 41% (30 requests) were made to Static.alternative.to and 9% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Static.alternative.to.
Page size can be reduced by 493.7 kB (35%)
1.4 MB
915.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Alternative.to main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 720.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.2 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.5 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Alternative images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 365.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 365.3 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Alternative.to needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 63.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (28%)
72
52
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Alternative. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
alternative.to
320 ms
www.alternative.to
696 ms
style.css
108 ms
jscript.js
508 ms
27424.js
144 ms
5fcdb19afb53283e511f3b48c1c10797.jpg
674 ms
gplus-32.png
47 ms
abf2f9ded8e580be8b51d26f61236f68.jpg
674 ms
6da6c4b5c79c5bb3d135ad8f966a47b3.jpg
687 ms
6e8db9adc0e53ceb5f1e8fae535bfce3.jpg
686 ms
19ca13ea3a64d7c4f79532b4f7d66d5a.jpg
698 ms
a5da8f34d49cce66b41e34004b691aec_s.png
492 ms
362d65368f61f50416609fd5e907ad16_s.png
594 ms
3686cc7b5e26de81d2cb2049b82a6125_s.png
696 ms
66bc399f7cfbd759aa0c9476708f3973_s.png
769 ms
01755597a45aa402022d2b9e1ac6833b_s.png
783 ms
0c5e2df22afe8d23dbac8b0b39809f8e_s.png
784 ms
0161d0f5c1f6bc226b69d48c148ee3a4_s.png
785 ms
e5fde6dce5019cf933f874ec95c5b68b_s.png
797 ms
157048e9a3cc1630f76291900e18a64d_s.png
799 ms
2038b8eedee1c8094d92a7dcc32d0dc8_s.png
867 ms
b09a3ea336bb7eb51cb1a0f0302ac295_s.png
882 ms
cfea591efe4a97c72106e48bf0ac7ccd_s.png
885 ms
6573bb3731d77178cb0379cc2dd1846f_s.png
884 ms
9c21081b68253fed39bba95c54b831c6_s.png
900 ms
00c102a200a5869166a180b6d1760366_s.png
901 ms
4e70d0b3491a4637abd4662cec1ebcf1_s.png
965 ms
d8a41861e465839d3316e6b062ab5711_s.png
980 ms
b81f64f6993bbfbda876e12df97c8337_s.png
983 ms
ee51222b03d7c5465b6d2b5c69a66e9c_s.jpg
982 ms
79b5767c2cc0808444ebd2ea1c1e145d_s.jpg
1000 ms
c3a43016e312f2afb3336bf4d1b93d0e_s.jpg
1001 ms
48c38cb4a0abf43d8110f86bdca5e669_m.png
1065 ms
d2f2b971da25be64ce3f023bfc7558cf_m.jpg
1080 ms
a3359fc515cb5e99d6327c05e25b4c41_m.jpg
1081 ms
68315d8199a7f4b12f34fa29e6419ca0_m.jpg
1082 ms
cds_thePowerOfChoice.png
127 ms
iconSmallTw.gif
125 ms
iconSmallFb.gif
208 ms
top_search_bg_no_usr_box.gif
213 ms
logo.gif
215 ms
top_search_input_bg.gif
234 ms
top_search_button.gif
235 ms
fake_img.gif
236 ms
bgSlideShowBottom.png
504 ms
bgSlideShowControler.png
309 ms
join_btn_black.png
310 ms
iconBigFb.png
311 ms
iconBigTw.png
313 ms
feedback.gif
315 ms
rss.png
410 ms
profile_content_box_header.gif
402 ms
altBorder.gif
403 ms
joinus_green_bg.gif
407 ms
bg_orange.png
407 ms
plusone.js
70 ms
ga.js
18 ms
all.js
17 ms
cds_bgBigSearcher.png
462 ms
__utm.gif
26 ms
141 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
11 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
23 ms
fastbutton
85 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
21 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
42 ms
postmessageRelay
45 ms
971028622-postmessagerelay.js
7 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
34 ms
rs=AGLTcCOUSJIRFuWfIxRmYNF0NPW_T9054A
8 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
6 ms
like_box.php
68 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
6 ms
WRYTpCDr6V4.css
14 ms
alternative.to accessibility score
alternative.to best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
alternative.to SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Alternative.to can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Alternative.to main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
alternative.to
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Alternative. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: